User talk:Laudak
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Golden gun
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Golden gun, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bondunlimited.com/alphabetical/g/golden-gun-the.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 01:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Dear CorenSearchBot driver, the website in question says:
- "Source: © Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses collated material from various entries taking off from the Wikipedia article James Bond."
- Please update your bot to check for mirrors and acknowledgements. Therefore I removed the warning placed by bot in the article. User:Laudak
[edit] Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 03:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- It looks like wikipedia bots hate me. The one above thinks I am a plagiarizer... And this one plainly hates my signature -User:Laudak
[edit] Did you know...
--Allen3 talk 22:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Category:United Kingdom pop musical group stubs
I listed it for discussion here, which is the correct place. Feel free to contribute to the discussion. Sorry about the bureaucracy, it gets on my nerves too. the wub "?!" 18:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Neotectonics
I nominated your article, Neotectonics, for DYK for September 25. If you disagree with this nomination or do not like my hook, please feel free to change it however you want. Regards, --Mattisse 01:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
--Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 00:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Avalanche control, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 16:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Did you know
--Allen3 talk 15:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK - Facilitating payment
Cheers, ~ Riana ⁂ 12:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Water stop
Shit happens. Do you want me to slap a tag? `'Míkka 18:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
Great work on this article Laudak. This was a fascinating subject that I'd never heard of before! It's actually a little scary that computers are making up better jokes than I can. --JayHenry (talk) 22:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:List of wikipedia-related insults
Just to clarify:
- This page is not a listing of specific Wikipedians. It's a page of euphemisms about or referring to Wikipedians (as well as referring to Wikis and Wikipedia). As such, it doesn't belong in Category:Wikipedians.
- Category:Wikipedia Wikipediology - if you look over the category, you should see rather quickly why it's not appropriate here either.
- Category:Wikipedia as a media topic - Do you have a link showing that this list has been an article in the media? It looks simply like original research.
- Category:Wikipedia culture - You could possibly make an argument about this being added to rhis category of general essays, I suppose. But in looking over the page, it's clearly just a copy of a bunch of words taken from the urban dictionary. This isn't so much "culture", as a "List of X" page.
I previously removed the culture cat and left the media cat, I see now that that was incorrect.
I'm removing the first 3, and leaving the culture cat (for now). Be aware though that the page itself may be nominated for deletion if it doesn't develop into more than just a list of semi-associated words. - jc37 08:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Egg Dance
Nice work on expanding the Egg Dance article. It looks like you must have spent quite some time in the library looking up all that stuff. Richerman (talk) 15:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Today the following text was posted on Mikkai's page, who posted it on mine. I would say it ended up as a three way international collaboration - I started the ball (or the egg!) rolling, Mikkai worked hard to bring it down the field and you helped to put it in the goal; Happy Easter! Richerman (talk) 20:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Happy Easter my friend. Thanks for the nice thought of adding these festive articles! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 16:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Jewish Question
Very much appreciate your understanding of the issues involved, and taking the appropriate action! Cheers. --Ludvikus (talk) 23:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Can you check if I did everythong properly regarding my move requests I'm showing you below? Also I welcome & value your independeny opinion on the matter at hand:
*Jewish Peril → The Jewish Peril - The latter is the exact, correct, title of the book/pamphlet (1920). --Ludvikus (talk) 12:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC) *Final Solution → The Final Solution - The latter is the common usage - except[ion] to WP rules? --Ludvikus (talk) 14:10, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed name-change space
Hi. Thanks again for your assistance previously. Also, I noticed your copyediting work - good job!!! I wander if you could advise where to go to propose a name change. I seem to have lost the address. Thankx. --Ludvikus (talk) 01:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've made a posting like so (Please advise if in correct & proper form. --Ludvikus (talk) 02:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)):
[edit] 8 May 2008 Historical Revisionism (negationism) → Historical Revisionism -- It's the common usage. --Ludvikus (talk) 02:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Brenda Biesterfeld
I have nominated Brenda Biesterfeld, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda Biesterfeld. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? RGTraynor 18:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] IRD asset
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of IRD asset, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.leismaninsurance.com/2004%20April%20IRD%20article.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiCookie
Just stopping by with wikicookies for those editors who started new articles today. --Rosiestep (talk) 07:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Good luck!
You'll needed it. I've noticed your attempt to edit Historical Revisionism - very difficult place. And I really believe - having seen your work elsewhere - that things can only get better with your presence. Sincerely, my best wishes to you. --Ludvikus (talk) 15:49, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- FYI. There are only 3 active editors there. No one else seems to be willing to touch the sight - oops- gotta go. The water for my coffee's boiling! But I'll be back. --Ludvikus (talk) 16:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- What I want to tell you is that I find there's no correlation whatsoever between that first footnote and the (1st) paragraph to which it refers. I suggest you read carefully the text they quoting as their reference. --Ludvikus (talk) 16:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- But that's a minor point. You realize that mainstream scholarship holds "Historical Revisionism" to be so much hogwash. And that it's substantially known for its holocaust denial. But you wouldn't know that would you by reading this Wikipedia article? A word to the wise is sufficient. --Ludvikus (talk) 16:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 6/11 DYK
--Bedford Pray 11:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Humor: International Journal of Humor Research
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Thingg⊕⊗ 18:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)