Talk:Laura Bush

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Laura Bush has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
May 29, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography     (Rated B-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] This article is supported by the Politics and government work group. More information about this article... The following comments have been left for this page: Pictures, subheadings, and good info. However, expansion is needed, and an infobox would be helpful. Green caterpillar 21:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC) (edit) WikiProject Texas (Rated B-Class) This article is part of WikiProject Texas, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Texas. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. WikiProject University of Texas at Austin This article is part of WikiProject University of Texas at Austin, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to The University of Texas at Austin, the people, history, and sports teams of the University, and promoting development of related articles. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. UT Portal
This article has an assessment summary page.

Archives

/Archive 1

[edit] GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Laura Bush/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

I like the structure, prose and amount of content (both textual and photographs). This article is also excellently referenced.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Good use of a wide range of references - all the context is cited properly.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Very well done, and I hope you consider preparing it for WP:FAC. I advise a copyedit from someone new to the text, please see Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers and Wikipedia:WikiProject League of Copyeditors/Members for lists of editors who can help you.

— Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 18:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I just recently began working on this article after I had the honor of meeting Mrs. Bush on May 23. Again, thanks for the quick, yet very through, GA review. Best, Happyme22 (talk) 21:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)