Talk:Late Roman army

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] CE discussion

My thoughts on the article Late Roman army:

  • I did tweak the lead a bit, so that should be fine.
  • The emphasis on clear cut distinction between the different time periods causes confusion and is perhaps unclearly/overly stated.
  • "The army of the Principate, as it was established by the founder-emperor Augustus (ruled 30 BC - 14 AD) and survived until the end of 3rd century, consisted of two distinct corps." thats clumsy
  • Use of c400 or ca. 400 breaks up the sentence a little
  • "The senior officers of the army were, until the 3rd century, mainly from the Italian aristocracy: senators, the highest order, provided the legati Augusti (provincial governors, who commanded military forces in the province as well as heading the civil administration); legati legionis (legion commanders); and tribuni militum laticlavii (legion deputy commanders); the equites ("knights"), the second order of nobility, provided the governors of Egypt and a few smaller provinces, the praefectus praetorio (commander of the Praetorian Guard), the legions' remaining 5 tribuni militum (senior staff officers) and the praefecti (commanders) of the auxiliary regiments." that's one sentence.
  • "The Illyrian emperors continued to rule the empire until 379" - empire is redundant
  • Other sections of the evolution section appear okay.
  • Try to avoid abbreviations
  • single numbers should be word, not figure (i.e. three, not 3)
  • There are some one line paragraphs about that need to be merged ideally
  • The notes sections under the table could be wikified into a less clumsy formatting.
  • WP:MOS prefers that headings don't start with "the"

All in all, it is an excellent article. Could it do with a copy edit? There are a number of things that do need tweaking, more than the ones I have mentioned above, though there are also massive chunks of text that have no major issues. It doesn't need particular attention in terms of copy editing that I can see, but like 95% of articles on wikipedia, it does need some.