From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Editing Guidelines |
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
Article upgrading needed: You can help! |
WP:IA |
Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films
- Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development.
To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met:
- Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.)
- Film infobox ({{infobox film}})
- Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.)
- Plot summary
- Include cast and crew information.
- At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.)
- Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))
Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF
Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
|
|
|
|
Make from old page Last Exit see that page's history for the history. Pete.Hurd 02:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Working on the article
To Indiecat, and anyone else who's interested: Let's talk about improving the article. I think there are three things to concentrate on at first.
- Format and structure. The article needs to conform to the Manual of Style for articles. To begin with, the article should not start with a ==Header==. It should just begin with the first sentence. The rest of the article should be structured according to the WikiProject Films style guide.
- Tone and point of view. All the subjective language that can't be attributed to a direct quote from an outside source must be removed. This is an encyclopedia article, and information must be presented from a neutral point of view. Descriptions such as "remarkably deft" and "passionate, convincing performances" are subjective value judgments, not statements of fact. If you can find similar statements from reputable critics, then those can be used, properly cited (more on that in my next point), in the "Reception" section of the article.
- References and citations. Simply adding more external links is not adequate. Each statement of fact (other than in the direct description of the film--the source there is presumed to be the film itself) and each quoted or paraphrased opinion must be supported by a separate citation. There are a variety of ways to do this, and they are described at WP:CITE. The simplest method for citing Web sources would be to use inline links: After each statement needing a reference, place the relevant URL in single brackets [like this].
I know you want to do well by your film, but Wikipedia is not a free space for advertising and self-promotion. Sooner or later, this article has to change. At the moment it reads like a publicity kit, not an encyclopedia article. You can resist my suggestions in the short run, but in the long term, other editors will come in and make many of the same changes I tried to make. --ShelfSkewed Talk 04:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)