Talk:Last Bronx

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Last Bronx article.

Article policies

This article is within the scope of the The Sega Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sega products. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low priority within The Sega Project

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
A request for box art or an application icon has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

[edit] article is finally complete

With the LAST version released yesterday in Japan (the game will not be released overseas!) and the final update today, i think this article is now complete. Hope you'll enjoy it and that i've succeeded to share my enthusiasm about this classic game! ;) -aurevoir- EnthusiastFRANCE 18:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

You should nominate it as a featured article. Fantastic! Enrique Vargas 02:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
No way! This is one of the worst articles I've seen written. Is this supposed to be a fansite or an encyclopedic article? There's too much needless praise and unneeded trivia. Jonny2x4 21:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
I would disagree with both of you... @EJVargas: while it is a really well written article, containing an amazing amount of details, we're still talking about something reporting about a rather unknown game, which accordingly won't be useful to a majority of the wikipedia users - so no need to flag it as a 'featured article'. @Jonny2x4: To mine eyes, the article delivers as much background-info on the game as possible - moreover, it seems to be more or less the only one in english language offering that amount of depth. Since the subject at issue is not something based in the real world, and since wikipedia also got lots of articles featuring in-depths review of fictional things/persons/etc., I definetely object to your comment. Oh - and as for calling it "the worst articles I've seen written" seems to indicate that you have lost your eyes some while ago. (Yes, pun intended, and admittedly it's a bad one - but I definetely mean it... especially since the blatant use of stereotypes you've been using always makes me go into defiant mode whereever I see it! ) Finally.... @EnthusiastFRANCE: I can only acknowledge the huge ammount of effort you put into this article! Good work & thank you! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.141.220.56 (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC).