User talk:Larry Lawrence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

LARRY LAWRENCE'S TALK PAGE

Feel free to leave messages~


Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Again, welcome!--WillMak050389 17:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Iraq War

It was determined by consensus that the Iraq War is part of the United States led campaign known as "War on Terrorism." Before editing against the consensus, please check the talk page and discuss it there, [1]. Rangeley 22:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Thank you for being open minded and not believing repeated yet unsubstantiated claims there is consensus. The page this biased editor is referring to has an ongoing RFC on the subject, meaning people can still comment on whether Iraq was invaded to fight terrorism or not. Nomen NescioGnothi seauton 09:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
The consensus does infact exist, I know you may not agree with it but you as of yet have been unable to raise any concerns about it. I ask anyone who objects to the consensus to state their objections to it, and they will be addressed. This is more effective, and constructive than reverting edits, or simply ignoring the consensus. Rangeley 12:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Self-proclaimed consensus build upon manipulated (again he changed my comments) "polls" is worthless. There is a RFC ongoing, you are welcome to address your position there. Untill such time it is evident that consensus had yet to be reached. I won't be taking part since discussion with this editor is impossible. Regardless of the arguments you advance he keeps repeating that Iraq was invaded to fight terrorism: wast of time and energy. Nomen NescioGnothi seauton 12:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
You have since admitted there was terrorists in Iraq and Iraq funded terrorists. You continue to refuse to even state why you think the US invaded Iraq. I dont understand how anyone is suppose to reach a concensus when you refuse to state your view. --zero faults |sockpuppets| 13:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Feel free to read the miles of text by others and myself explaining just that. And to be clear, I have not admitted terrorists were hiding under protection of SH in Iraq. Nomen NescioGnothi seauton 13:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Can you please state here what your opinion is of why the US went to war in Iraq then. I have yet to see you ever mention it, others have said their reasons, but you have not. So what was the reason in your opinion? --zero faults |sockpuppets| 13:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Stop removing content from Iraq War. Please? Consensus? Compromise? Rmt2m 22:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Iraq War Warnings

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Iraq War. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. HawkerTyphoon 18:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Iraq War. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. HawkerTyphoon 18:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Please be aware that you are close to being in violation of the Wikipolicy Three Revert Rule on Iraq War. If you revert an entry by another user on this article in the next 24 hours. In the last 24 hours you have made the following reverts:

  1. 22:27, 3 August 2006
  2. 18:29, 4 August 2006
  3. 18:42, 4 August 2006
  4. 18:58, 4 August 2006

If you make another revert on this article prior to 18:29 5 August 2006 (UTC) you will be reported and may be subject to up to 24 hours of involuntary wiki-vacation (otherwise known as block up to 24 hours). --Bobblehead 19:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removing of WoT labels

You are the only one that is not attempting to discuss whether or not the Iraq War is part of the WoT. The rest of us have been hashing it out for months and have consensus on U.S. "War on Terrorism" to signify that the label applies only to the US portion of the War on Terrorism and that the term War on Terrorism is a label and not an actual declaration of War, as such. At this point you're lack of involvement in the discussion is a disruption to the editting of the articles and it'd be great if you tried to talk it out on the discussion page rather than make the edit and tell others to discuss something that's already been discussed and agreed upon. --Bobblehead 19:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Discuss it first. Please? Rmt2m 20:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Larry Lawrence for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Bobblehead 20:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)