User talk:Larisv

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Larisv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  NikoSilver 22:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Turkish invasion of Cyprus

I would be better if your could take your concerns to the talk page. Also, please be aware of the three-revert rule, which states that no one can revert a page more than 3 times in 24 hours. Thanks, Khoikhoi 00:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Larisv, please start discussing your edits related to Cyprus. Revert warring is pointless, if there is something you dispute, raise it on the discussion. --A.Garnet 17:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

A consensus had already been achieved with the present tags. If you want to introduce a totallydisputed tag, then you have to prove the aricle is factually incorrect, this you have not been able to do. In fact, you do not even dispute the factual accuracy of the article, you just do not like the facts on show. Well sorry, you have shown no reason to break the consensus already achieved. --A.Garnet 10:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
A. Garnet, reverting every edit in you article that does not conform to a Turkish Cypriot POV will not get you anywhere. Both myself and other uses have set out in detail why a totallydisputed tag is warranted. If you don't want a tag, stop using Wikipedia for propaganda.Larisv 13:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of largest flags

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of largest flags. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - ∅ (∅), 11:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please use talk

With regards to your recent edits, please do remember to use the talk page to discuss edits. When I go through your edits to articles, I see revert after revert after revert after revert. Dozens of reverts in the past few days alone. But when I go to your edits to talk pages, I see that you've left only two messages on article talk pages in recent days: this one and this one. Both to the same article, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. You've edited no other talk pages, even though you reverted about a dozen other articles this week. The article Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus has been protected (by me) as a result of a revert war you were involved in, the others may well be protected in the foreseeable future. Wikipedia is a community project, please discuss with the other members of this community. AecisBrievenbus 22:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

When you go through the edits you will see that they refer to two or three issues appearing in a series of (three) related articles not twelve. You will also see that the pattern is the following: an edit is made in one of the articles which A. Garnet immediately reverts without explanation or comment, or any statement in the talk page. Maybe you should direct your comments somewhere else. A. Garnet has been using exactly the same tactit with another user in the TRNC article.Larisv 13:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)