User talk:Lanfear's Bane

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Lanfear's Bane, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Signature icon.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! DuncanHill 22:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Contents

[edit] Humanities desk

thanks for your help on the humanities desk, and good on you for your contribs in general, but I could have done without the slight snippiness implicit in: 'A quick Google search revealed' (I didn't know the term 'forms of religious address' to google it, that's why i turned to the WP desks); and the brusqueness of 'Nothing. 'Your Eminence' counts as an address. Anyway, surely he would not have been addressed in English?' - no big deal, just the unnecessarily superior tone got under my skin a little. Adambrowne666 11:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

The Wikipedia:Etiquette article does point out "Keep in mind that raw text is ambiguous and often seems ruder than the same words coming from a person standing in front of you.". It also indicates that "Be careful of the words you choose – what you intended might not be what others perceive, and what you read might not be what the author intended.". I was simply trying to provide you with some good information sources without 'a plate of accompanying waffle', so to speak, give a description of the actions I had taken so that someone else could follow them themselves and pose a further question that you might have wanted to consider. I apologise if you had the impression that I was acting arrogantly or improperly, I was aiming for a more thoughtful or questioning tone. Lanfear's Bane

[edit] New user

As a new user you may want to assure that you get off to a better start by reading Wikipedia:Disruptive editing and Wikipedia:What is a troll?. Julie Dancer 14:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

As a new user less than ten days older than myself, you may want to assure that you get off to a better start by reading Wikipedia:Assume good faith and sense of humour. Lanfear's Bane
A new user nonetheless not inclined to troll. Julie Dancer 17:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
If you consider mentioning a game of extensive discussion and of some controversy in Wikipedia in a topic on what compromises a game in a tongue-in-cheek way, then yes, I am a terrible, terrible troll and you should probably bring me to the attention of an admin.
In the event that I had actually added the comment in an attempt to troll then you should have considered the following paragraph from the article on trolling to which you referred. "When you try to decide if someone is a troll, strive to assume they are not. Explain errors politely and reasonably; point them towards policies, the manual of style and relevant past discussions. Don't conclude they are a troll until they have shown complete inability or unwillingness to listen to reason or to moderate their position based upon the input of others. Even in that case, it is likely better to remain silent and let others conclude the obvious instead of calling someone a troll and creating even more mayhem. It is better to humor a troll for too long than to drive away a sincere but misguided user. Remember and apply the principles laid out at Wikipedia:Don't bite the newcomers." As you can see from the sections highlighted in bold you failed to explain why my comment was trolling, you concluded I was a troll as indicated in your edit comment, you failed to remain silent and instead jumped to conclusions and implied I was a troll, again in your edit comment. Perhaps you should have read the article on trolling more thoroughly yourself instead of parading it to others. Lanfear's Bane

[edit] Misc Desk

I have reverted your speculation about Madelaine's death. One thing we can do without is legal problems. --Dweller 11:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Article mentions that the parents were suspects. Are we not allowed to comment on this? If not, fair enough. Lanfear's Bane
Presumably, per BLP, that assertion is referenced. --Dweller 11:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] hey mate

thanks for helping me figure out what song was played in the Nip/Tuck commercial. How did you find it? --MKnight9989 12:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. With a little help from Google which just so happened to point me straight back at Wikipedia :) Lanfear's Bane 12:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
haha thanks. --MKnight9989 12:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Do your own homework"

For god's sake give it a rest.

Or, alternatively, do your own homework. Lanfear's Bane 15:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
An interesting point. I'm beginning to think that you may be a parrot.
Incidentally, I am not a schoolboy and do not have any homework. Nor have I recently posted a question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.254.147.52 (talk) 15:35, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Do your own homework. Lanfear's Bane 08:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Grow up. 80.254.147.52 09:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Do your own homework. Lanfear's Bane 09:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Niceness on the Reference Desk

Although we don't do people's homework for them, it is no bad thing to - instead of brusquely telling them to "do your own homework" - point them in the right direction to begin their research. If you are unable to help in that way, perhaps not replying would be better. Neil ム 15:03, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Make an effort to show that you have tried solving it first. I just feel we are encouraging laziness and that the humanities desk is the worst for it. The very fact that you do answer it for them is ironically not helping them. On a side note however - I am terribly nice in general. Perhaps the 'Before asking a question' section at the top should be changed to: Do your own homework. The reference desk will not give you answers for your homework, although we will try to help you out if there is a specific part of your homework you do not understand. Make an effort to show that you have tried solving it first. However, if you cannot provide proof of this or have simply copied the question to Wikipedia we will help you anyway. Lanfear's Bane 15:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Pointing them in the right direction is never a wrong thing to do. If you think it encourages laziness, perhaps you should sit on your hands and leave it for someone else to respond to. You are by no means the only RD regular who is guilty of, at times, appearing to be rude (and now sarcastic). We could all be nicer. Neil ム 15:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I do point in the right direction if there is indication of effort on their behalf and even sometimes without. I simply think the blatant copy and pastes should not be spoonfed - it's clearly laid out at the top of the page. And as for the sarcasm, yes and sorry; I will point out however that it is accurate. Lanfear's Bane 15:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trivia guidelines and policy

Hi. I just read your thoughts on trivia and I was wondering if you would be interested in this.

Here is a wikiproject proposal for trivia and a fresh look at trivia policy by the admins. Support the wikiproject proposal. Add your name to the list here: wiki project proposal for wikitrivia

Please send this link to other users that you feel would be interested. Thanks Ozmaweezer 14:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Added, although I think there is already a similar group. Lanfear's Bane 15:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 11:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Lies, lies, lies. Damn Sinebot, I call shenanigans. Lanfear's Bane | t 10:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gravity guns

Actually, we do make gravity guns. They're all stashed out at Area 51, where we use them to play checkers with crashed UFOs. Anyway, thanks for the laugh that comment brought me. — Lomn 02:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Heh, no problem. Now seriously, send me one of those gravity guns, I'll pay the postage and packaging. Lanfear's Bane | t 10:09, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good call

I agree 100% with this edit: [1]. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 13:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Based on Wikipedia_talk:Reference_desk/Science#Reckless, good guide to compare questions against. And thanks :) Lanfear's Bane | t 13:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm flattered! But seriously, there is a tendency around here – and I'm sometimes guilty of this myself – to only speak up when someone screws up. I figure a pat on the back is the least I can do, given the grief that that sort of edit can kick up for you. Cheers! TenOfAllTrades(talk) 13:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Why thank you. I am looking into a little template I can use instead of all the cutting and pasting that I currently do, I'll ask opinion on the RD discussion before I implement anything. We should perhaps consider a little page somewhere with guidelines in reference to medical questions for the questionees who may be as unclear as some of us were. (How did I miss that page...) Lanfear's Bane | t 13:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vocabulary

One should know the meaning of a word before using it. And while you're at it, stop pissing on the reference desk. Who are you to decide when medical advise is being sought. We have the disclaimers for a reason, you know. —Nricardo 19:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, and you should stop violating them. Look, I used a redundant comma, you gonna try and pull me on that too? I'll address your belligerent behaviour to the desk discussion. Lanfear's Bane | t 21:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Update. Bad user, bad. In your bed, on your rug. Bad user. Lanfear's Bane | t 16:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Homework questions at the Desk

Hi—I'm a bit concerned about this edit you made, that removed a (possible) homework question from the Science Ref Desk.

Generally, we don't remove those questions, we just remind the person who posted it that the Ref Desk isn't in the business of providing homework solutions. If appropriate, you can also use the {{Dyoh}} template. It can also be helpful to leave suggestions about Wikipedia articles (or other websites) where they might be able to find information that might aid them in solving their problem or answering their question.

It's seen as rather BITEy to just excise the question and leave boldfaced policy quotes in their place. We don't come down on the homework questions quite as hard or as fast because a) there isn't nearly the same risk of harm to the poster or Wikipedia, and b) it's often possible to provide some guidance without doing the person's homework. If you're not sure about what types of questions are supposed to be flat-out removed from the Desk ( you might want to reread WP:RD/G) please ask first; shooting relatively harmless questions on sight tends to kick over the anthill on the talk page. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 17:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Incidentally, I was just poking through your contributions list, and it would be very helpful if you made an effort to write edit summaries for your edits. Thanks, TenOfAllTrades(talk) 18:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

I deleted it as it was a crosspost, same question was asked on the Computing desk here, as for edit summaries, I agree, I'll try harder in future, it's just laziness as you don't really need them the majority of the time on the reference desk and I got into a bad habit. Lanfear's Bane | t 09:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] EVE o/

I'm not actually someone you know from EVE. :) You do though have a sort of 'namesister' that I know very well, which was what first attracted my attention. Other than that, I just know you as "that person by the name of ---". Jurskjeld is mine, so you don't really know me either. =)) 81.93.102.185 (talk) 14:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Ah OK cool, and no I don't recognise the name I am afraid. What do you mean by namesister? My alt? It's a half play on words and use of one of the characters pseudonyms from the novels. Other than that you have me stumped. Lanfear's Bane | t 15:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
No, I just mean a character named Lanfear. =) Would there be a point, you think, to update the images found at EVE Online? 81.93.102.185 (talk) 22:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
WP:Be_bold! Or discuss it on the talk page first. :) Lanfear's Bane | t 09:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Final warning

Following a request by User:Julie Dancer at WP:ANI (here) I am notifying you that repeating your comments at the editors talkpage, or anywhere else, will constitute a personal attack and an attempt to WP:HARASS. Under the circumstances, there being a history of you reverting to your comments not in keeping with WP policy and guidelines, any violation of this warning will result in a short block. Please note that I have now watchlisted the talk and userpages. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Refers to three edits / reverts on a rude troll / sockpuppet talk page over a nine month period. (See: User_talk:Lanfear's_Bane#New_user. I never knew Wikipedia was so harsh. Lanfear's Bane | t 15:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)