Talk:Lakeside Apartments District, Oakland, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject California This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article is within the scope of the San Francisco Bay Area WikiProject, a collaborative effort to build a more detailed guide on Wikipedia's coverage of San Francisco and the Bay Area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Cities, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to cities, towns, and various other settlements on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

Since when is this a neighborhood? I've never heard of it, having lived in Oakland for decades. This neighborhood is either referred to as "downtown" or "Lake Merritt." There are no references on the web that don't trace back to this article. Apparently the user who created this entry (and invented the neighborhood!) has disappeared. Lagringa 14:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

It is frustrating that people are using these pages to promote their real estate developments and/or neighborhood associations. I have changed the language to reflect the fact that this is just a tiny area that the vast majority of Oaklanders have never heard of. If someone wants to defend the idea that this is a "neighborhood" I would like to be enlightened. Lagringa 10:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Laringa, this is a neighborhood, come here and look around and study your history. Also, I think you, Laringa, are a developer who wants to minimize the significance of the neighborhood so you can put up your crappy towers.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.104.90.191 (talk • contribs) .

How about addressing the question instead of engaging in personal attacks? Lagringa 21:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok "Lagringa," you got questions, I got answers: if you go down to the Oakland main library and chat up a reference librarian, she or he can point you in the proper diection on this. During a City of Oakland Cultural Heritage Survey in the early 80's, five blocks of this neighborhood to include 27 buildings, were designated to be a part of the historic "Lakeside Apartments District." You can find further documentation on this in the links contained in this article.

      • Furthermore.......LaGringa....I might add that most of these are rent-controlled apartments built well before 1983. Aren't most of them therefore worth saving for that reason alone so that working class folks, single mothers, veterans, and seniors can have an affordable place to live near mass transit and the healthful beauty of Lake Merritt? Or are you just a black-hearted capitalist who would like to see the fine print of the Redevelopment Act used to displace long time Oaklanders with private emminent domain and other leagalized forms of plutocratic tyranny? The Coup De Jour is a DeLaFuente/Desley Brooks condo conversion to kick an old woman out of her apartment. Do you really want that? --- "I've never heard of it..." -- "Just a tiny area that the vast majority of Oaklanders have never heard of." -- "if someone wants to defend the idea that this is a neighborhood..." Well I hope I've brought some sense of enlightenment to your appreciation of the possibility of our system protecting people's basic needs through law. Think about the reprocussions of your implications before you write about them. -"Unsigned...because ideas should speak for themselves."

Contents

[edit] History of the district

...I believe it would be informative to include some information about the history of the district, if there are any history buffs out there, please chime in.Critical Chris (talk) 08:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Crime and disorder problems

Also some information on the district's significant crime and disorder history would be relevant.Critical Chris (talk) 08:03, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Demographic makeup of the neighborhood

This would be interesting and educational to read about. Anyone care to share any data?Critical Chris (talk) 11:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Agustus or August Schilling?

I have found a lot of references to August Schilling, the spice magnate. We know he was born in Germany; naturally, his birth name could have been more Germanic than the Anglicized August, a variant of Augustus (Caesar). What source states the spelling of his name as Agustus? I can't find it. And why would we want to use Schilling's birth name spelling when his fame came while he was known as August Schilling? Binksternet (talk) 05:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I believe you are right and I will try to make the necessary corrections, thanks for bringing it to my attention.Critical Chris (talk) 17:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Islamic small-1.jpg

Image:Islamic small-1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I've asserted that this is a historic photograph from several years ago of a vantage point that no longer exists, there is now a building where that parking lot sits.Critical Chris (talk) 08:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
A lot of times the BetacommandBot just wants to see a statement regarding which article(s) is using the image. I've added such a statement. Binksternet (talk) 08:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you Blinksternet.Critical Chris (talk) 21:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)