Talk:Lake Vostok
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Lake Vostok is part of WikiProject Lakes, a WikiProject which aims to systematically improve lake-related articles using the tools on the Project page. You are welcome and encouraged to edit the article attached to this page and to join the project. |
 |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Antarctica, which collaborates on articles related to Antarctica. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | ||||||
|
|||||||
 |
This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. | ||||||
 |
This article has been selected for Version 0.5 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia. | ||||||
|
|||||||
Contents |
[edit] Ancient life in Lake Vostok?
Back in 2003 I watched a Russian TV program, in which they interviewed two eminent geographers, Andrei Kapitsa (Pyotr Kapitsa's son) and Alexei Zotikov, who predicted the lake's existence and conducted its first measurements.
The lake was first spied by Soviet pilots back in 1950s but the definitive study of the lake's dimensions was carried on by Kapitsa and Zotikov 20 years later. It is thought that the lake's surface was covered with ice 5 to 30 mln years ago. For all these years, the lake water didn't contact with atmosphere, therefore it contains the purest freshwater on Earth, free of any contaminants. It was demonstrated that the lake freshwater absorbs huge quanitities of oxygen from the snow shield above it. The water is unusually warm, probably a little below 0C, compared with -55C at the surface. The melting snow contains enough mineral substance to sustain certain forms of life.
While most of the geographers believe that the ancient life must be present in the form of bacteria, others point out that larger forms of life are not impossible too. According to them, the lake is situated in the region of high seismic activity, where hot thermal springs and oil are fairly common. The Russian scientists drained the tunnel to 3623 metres below the ice surface. They stopped 130 metres from the lake surface to investigate the possible methods of obtaining samples of Vostok water without damaging its ecosystem. The drilling is expected to be relaunched in 2007.
The study of ice already obtained from the drilling have yielded some interesting results. For example, some species of extinct bacteria were discovered that could have thrived only at temperatures 55C and higher. --Ghirlandajo 14:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Those seeking citation for the 1 million year isolation might use "The Spark of Life: Darwin and the Primeval Soup," by Christopher Wills and Jeffrey Bada (see p. 244) -- ACzernek 14:32, 30 November 2007
[edit] Measurements
In my change just now, I substituted metric measurements for the imperial measurements of the ridge, to match the existing measurements and the style guide. The most significant change was the volume, from 1800 km^3 to 5400; the latter figure comes from the recent research by Studinger et al. Isidore 08:57, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Does it really make sense to translate "roughly" 150m to "exactly" 492 feet, rather than just saying 500 (since it's a "rough" number)
- No, I missed that one! Isidore 12:33, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- It makes more sense still to check our facts... various other sites say 120m (such as gdl.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/scotia/vserm/vserm070904.htm) and others say 100m (such as science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast05mar98_1.htm), with "roughly" and "about" thrown in. If anyone reads Russian, maybe they'd care to check an original source. Isidore 12:49, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
-
- http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/pi/vostok/Report.pdf is the final report from the NSF-sponsored Lake Vostok Workshop, held in November 1998. It says "approximately 120m". Isidore 21:01, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Metric
You are right Isidore, sorry about that. I should have read the guidelines more carefully since this was my first contribution to Wiki – I’ll try to be more careful next time. Cheers, Roo.
[edit] Slashdot comment
A while ago I linked to this article in a Slashdot comment, and in response to my post an anonymous contributor there offered some criticisms of this article. Anyone who knows enough to analyze these criticisms and amend the article accordingly is welcome to read the Slashdot comment. --Saforrest 23:42, Nov 10, 2004 (UTC)
[edit] New Review
In the Siegert MJ (2005). "Lakes Beneath the Ice Sheet: The Occurrence Analysis, and Future Exploration of Lake Vostok and Other Antarctic Subglacial Lakes". Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci (33): 215-245. artikle there are several points which are missed in the article:
- There are several meassurments how deep the lake is(500 or more than 1000).
- The concentration of oxygen is estimated to be 17 mikromolar to 850 mikromolar to 2.5 litres per liter which is quite much.
- There is a dispute about how old this lake is and if it really existed befor the glacias or was formed after the ice was thick enough to shield it against the supra cool air.
I will write something about this and put it up to discussion.Stone 16:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Is the above reference the source of information for stating that the maximum depth of Lake Vostok is 1000m deep? I note that in Lakenet, http://www.worldlakes.org/lakedetails.asp?lakeid=9230, lake vostok is referenced as having a maximum depth of only 500 m. I have seen other references online to a maximum depth of 670 m. I would appreciate any resolution of the many discrepancies of the maximum depth of this subglacial lake.--Pkrnger (talk) 01:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)--
[edit] Fossil water
Is this an example of fossil water? 141.155.28.92 01:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
