User talk:Lajsikonik

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Lajsikonik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - Darwinek 16:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Hello

Hello Lajsikonik, thanks for your Poland-related contributions. You may be interested in the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. Appleseed (Talk) 21:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Silesia

Cześć. Zapraszam cię do Wikipedia:WikiProject Silesia. Mam nadzieję że się wpiszesz na listę użytkowników i coś czasem poedytujesz związanego z naszym Śląskiem :) LUCPOL 22:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello Lajsikonik! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  15:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Polish Communes

Hi Lajsikonik! Ops, sorry. It is a one of my habit, I use Voivodship :(. But I know about it; we use Voivodeship, becouse it is a standart on English Wikipedia. Pozdrawiam! Marcin Suwalczan [our talk] 13:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Villages In Poland

Hi :-) Citation is generally useful and may help improve a stub article where there is little information on anything else. As you seem to have plenty of links, why not cite? It's not mandatory, but it is useful. Mentality 15:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Communes, communes/Gminy, gminy

Good evening Lajsikonik. "Gmina" or "Commune"? In my opinion the situation is clear - the term being used by us is "commune" (source) ;). Other topics - on IRC. Powinno być Houston, we have a problem :P. Pozdrawiam! Marcin Suwalczan [our talk] 19:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hej/cześć

Few notes. Our resident expert on this is User:Balcer, make sure to drop him a note. See also semi-active Wikipedia:WikiProject Geography of Poland, where most of those issues were discussed and consensus was reached in the past, and if you ever want to get attention of most active Poland-related editors, do so by dropping a note at WP:PWNB - I highly recommend watching that page and taking part in the life of our little friendly community here :) -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  20:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Polish villages and communes

Hi. It is good to see another person interested in improving geographical articles related to Poland. I never worry too much about the precise form of article titles. They can always be easily moved to something more appropriate later. The important thing is to have the articles.

To answer your specific questions, my suggestions for ambiguous cases would be, following the practice of Polish Wikipedia (why not?)

  • "Name Commune (Voivodeship)"
  • and for villages "Name (Voivodeship)" - or "Name (County)" in cases where there is more than one village with a given nname in a Voivodeship. In rare cases of two villages of the same name in the same county (say Bochotnica), go with "Name (Commune").

For one example, see Hrebenne, Hrebenne (Tomaszów Lubelski County). Hope this helps. Balcer 23:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block

About my removing of content in the article about the Himavanti Confraterinty Order - sorry, I didn't know that it was true but it was controversial content added without source. You also did the same in the article about Richard Matuszewski when I added info about his activism and you deleted it. And you can't just block me for "POV" just like that - I wasn't warned and I hadd asked not to be blocked in my edit discripton. Krystian 17:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Aha, it's OK, you've shortened the block. Krystian 20:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
It wasn't block "just 'cause POV", and matter this time wasn't controversial: it is well known fact that Mohan was three times arested, (you should use {fakt} temlate in this case, now it is properly sourced), but it wasn't main reason. Main reason was, again, an edit war, and you has been warned to do not "hide" a proper edits between POV to make rewert harder, and to discuss imortant change first on discussion page, you just won't search the consensus with other users (Rdrozd, Migatu, Szwedzki, and others) in controversial matter. Lajsikonik 20:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sai Baba of Shirdi

Why do you think the sources are insufficient. You supported the article on pl.wiki when there were even fewer sources? Kkrystian 14:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ludowe Zespoły Sportowe

I don't think the link you have added addresses the concern. It appears that is just a list of links from my check of the government site. It doesn't appear to address what LZS is at all. Am I missing something within that site? Erechtheus 00:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Forgotten Sunrise

A tag has been placed on Forgotten Sunrise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. tomasz. 22:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gratitude

Thankyou very very much Lajsikonik for your wonderful translation effort!
The Silesian language is very unique indeed.
May God Bless You! and may Silesian Wikipedia prosper and become a real Wikipedia soon.
In the future if you want your favourite article to be translated into the Chinese or Taiwanese language, then I would be be glad to help you.
Yours Sincerely, --Jose77 (talk) 08:16, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Favourite article created

Greetings Lajsikonik,
The article about Padniewko has now been translated into Traditional Chinese and created Here. You are welcome. --Jose77 (talk) 21:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)