Talk:Lagoon Engine Einsatz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] On the Merger Issue

DO NOT merge, cause the two are different stories, einsatz is in a fantasy world, whilst the other is based in modern world. The characters of the two DOES NOT overlap. I dont know why LE Einsatz is called LEE, but there are currently no obvious links to the two (except the name). IF there is a similarity shown in the future, the merger can be done then. 84.13.88.129 13:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, the two series are related. There are scenes in Einsatz where Sakis sees a vision of a boy dressed like either Jin or Yen from Lagoon Engine, and vice versa. Lagoon Engine in particular opens up in the beginning with Yen seeing a vision of Sakis's world. The Lagoon Engine and Lagoon Engine Einsaz take place in parallel worlds, with occasional links between them. The articles should be merged. Darkesword 01:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

They are related, but in no way are they so connected that they should be merged. A sequel and prequel never are merged if they have their own storylines, as is the case here. Although Sakis is shown in the beginning of Volume 1 in Lagoon Engine, Jin is shown at Lagoonaria (with the ring conspicuously shown on the upper left), and Jin's body shown in Lagoon Engine Einsatz (note that his costume is the same as in Lagoon Engine Volume 1), there are two distinct plots, two distinct sets of characters, and no solid proof that the two worlds are related in such a way that they are inherently one and the same. The articles should not be merged. 69.140.104.224 00:59, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

This article should not be merged. While the conection is implied, it is not actualy stated. Even if it were, that would still not be grounds for merging the two. -70.15.49.148 (talk) 20:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

There seems to be no reason to merge this article. I've re-written it to keep it within the standerds of Wikipedia -TheCrimsonANTHROPOLOGIST 03:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)