User talk:Lafmm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:SearchEngineStrategiesConf&Expo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:SearchEngineStrategiesConf&Expo.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:SearchEngineStrategiesConfandExpo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:SearchEngineStrategiesConfandExpo.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Clickz

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Clickz, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.clickz.com/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 23:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Clickz

A tag has been placed on Clickz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Moonriddengirl 23:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] clickz.com

I removed all links from the newly created ClickZ page in order to make it less of an advertisment. I hope this helps, if not please let me know what else I can do. I have read the terms and I am not looking to advertise - Matt

  • Please see WP:COI and if in doubt, don't ... richi 00:18, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] COI Advice

Hi, I am actually a speaker at Search Engine Strategies on the topic of Wikipedia and SEO. He're the standard warning message, which includes very good advice;

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. - Jehochman Talk 14:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Logos

Are you sure that the Image:SearchEngineStrategiesConfandExpo.gif and Image:SearchEngineWatch.gif logos have been released under the Free Art license as you tagged them? My hunch is that Incisive Media actually wants to exert some level of copyright protection over the use of the logos, but perhaps I'm wrong. If I am correct, however, then the {{Logo}} copyright tag might be more appropriate, provided a proper fair use rationale is given. --ZimZalaBim talk 03:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)