Talk:Labyrinth of Reflections
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article needs an infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Fantasy task force. (with unknown importance) | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Contents |
[edit] Shooter vs. Gunslinger
Shouldn't this be "Gunslinger" instead of "Shooter"? Both work as translations of the original word "Стредок" --Strannik 20:17, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Стрелок = Shooter 83.167.98.19 (talk) 07:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Gunslinger he was called in the original Russian text....
- By the way, isn't Crazy Totter, Crazy Tosser in fact? ellol 12:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Absolutely right, I've corrected it. MaxSem 12:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed. Sorry, mates. --Strannik 07:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- I never read Stephen King, so I didn't know it was "Gunslinger" and not "Shooter". Thanks for correcting me. Thanks for "Jinx" too. I was trying to come up with a better translation, but all I could think of was "Unlucky One" and "Loser". Chronolegion 15:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deep Psychosis
How much of what Leonid experienced in the first novel really happened and how much was due to deep psychosis? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chronolegion (talk • contribs) 17:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC).
- I'm not sure if Lukyanenko really wanted to make a visible border, I think his idea was to make every reader decide it himself. MaxSem 18:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, no. In his old forum (currently offline), Lukyaninko explained that everything except the last chapter of the novel really happened. The big clue was that all Deep scenes werre written in present tense and all real-world scenes were written in past tense. The last chapter was written in present tense, yet it supposedly took place in real world. He was suprised few people caught on to that.--Strannik 01:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- And it's actually in his old FAQ as well. Here is the link to the relevant part (scroll down a bit) --Strannik 02:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- I guess the same is true about Jinx. He could've been an alien, a time traveller, a being from another dimension, etc. Chronolegion 13:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, no. In his old forum (currently offline), Lukyaninko explained that everything except the last chapter of the novel really happened. The big clue was that all Deep scenes werre written in present tense and all real-world scenes were written in past tense. The last chapter was written in present tense, yet it supposedly took place in real world. He was suprised few people caught on to that.--Strannik 01:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Labyrinth of Reflections cover.jpg
Image:Labyrinth of Reflections cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Неудачник as Jinx and Стрелок as Gunslinger?
Why was Неудачник translated as Jinx and Стрелок as Gunslinger? Wouldn't Luckless and Shooter be more appropriate respectively? 85.146.78.111 20:43, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Lukyanenko explicitly states that Стрелок is after Stephen King. MaxSem 21:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- As for Неудачник, it was my call. I decided that this was the best way to convey the contextual meaning of the name. --Strannik 00:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- 'Loser' is IMO better in context of video games. MaxSem 08:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
