Talk:La Nature
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
La Nature is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.) |
|
I just marked this page as a possible copyvio, not because it was translated from http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Nature (which is free through the GFDL), but because http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Nature is essentially identical to http://www.gloubik.info/Revue-la-recherche/la-nature/la-nature.html. I looked at the history of http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Nature but could not find an older version of http://www.gloubik.info/Revue-la-recherche/la-nature/la-nature.html at archive.org to compare them. So I'm stumped as to which came first. --Butseriouslyfolks 02:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
The French version indeed is more or less a direct copy from the website you identified, something I did not really notice. The English version, however, has some other elements, and I believe it is still salvageable if I find some other sources and use appropriate citations. Is this permissible? --Oreo Priest 03:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oreo Priest did a bit more digging and determined, based on this page, that Gloubik is responsible for both pages listed above. When Gloubik posted the material to fr.wikipedia, it became GFDL licensed. Thus, there is no copyvio, and I am reverting the tag I applied. --Butseriouslyfolks 03:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Hello! i'm the author of http://www.gloubik.info/Revue-la-recherche/la-nature/la-nature.html and i copy it on http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Nature . there is no copyvio. -Gloubik 19:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
