Talk:Lüscher color test
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Today the Max Luscher is regarded as a historical party game with little reliability. The test is seen as inaccurate because colors are not quantified, accurate, or uniform; participants responded to color names rather than colors alone, and the resulting analysis was prone to interpretation and generally seen to fit a wide range of individuals. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.197.131.72 (talk • contribs)
This test and the whole article is preposterous! I tried to do the test as instructed and then I did it randomly and also in different patterns and the results are always the same or at least very similar. This test has no predictive value whatsoever. Having this article in this form on wikipedia only makes it lose credibility! A simple warning abut the desputed neautrality of the text is NOT ENOUGH!
alexxarian@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.157.243.132 (talk) 18:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
1. "party game" comment mere opinion, citation needed. 2. "inaccuracies.." patently false, published versions use standard descriptors, Pantone etc.. 3. "responded to color names rather" patently false, as above, printed color cards are not named! 4. "generally seen to fit a wide range of individuals" spurious comment, test makes no claims for uniqueness or temporal consistency. Roy Coleman (talk) 18:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
