User talk:László Szegedi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, László Szegedi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Csak, hogy itt is üdvözölve legyél :) . Üdv --Dami 16:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Ausztria_drágakövek.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ausztria_drágakövek.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dolcett

  • There is a discussion under way about the speedy deletion of Dolcett, which I am not happy about. I'd like to have your opinion, since I read your books, and you mention Dolcett in one of them. Do you consider Dolcett has notable, could you help in finding references (your book for instance) ? Hektor 15:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for the delayed answer, but I am abroad now (in England) and did not check my account for long. I am happy, you read my book. Yes, I had a note about Dolcett in one of the volumes. I think every production is important from some point of view. I mentioned Dolcett as part of the mass culture, which is the social system we live in today. So, we cannot ingnore Dolcett if there is some real achievements connected to them whatever bad or good they are. We have to know the names at least. For this reason, in my opinion, Wikipedia should have some two or three sentences about him as well.László Szegedi 09:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Article about Hungarian heraldry

Hello László Szegedi, I am a Finn and I recently wrote a stub article about Hungarian heraldry. I thought to ask You to help with some translations of basic heraldic terminology in the article, which would make easier to find out more. (Terot 17:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC))

Hello Terot, I have already provide the Hungarian terms found at the site under your edition. If you need some further, please, put them to the table and I will provide the Hungarian equivalents. As regards the article itself, it is a good starting point, but as far as I can see it repeats the stereotypes about Hungarian heraldry found in the English heraldry books. I have read already more than 30 but no one gave a real picture of this heradry style. First of all, Hungarian heraldry has its own feature. So it is an exaggeration that follows the German heraldry or it is more bloody etc. The Hungarian and Central European heraldry being not grounded on the constructional view as the french or English. It is not based on the ordinaries and sub-ordinaries. I think the article should be written from the point of view of the Hungarian heraldry, not from an outside view of an English heraldrist. Anyway, I could contribute to the article continuously if you agree, to make the article as good as possible. If so, please, write to my e-mail: gryfmedia@gmail.com to be reconcile the tasks of the edition. --László Szegedi 13:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)