User talk:Kwib
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Brilliant Addition to Whitgift - are you planning to do all the school-train links? Its a notable addition to the page. Victuallers 09:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Brighton-college-arms.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Brighton-college-arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Railways
Thx again - adding good refs is a very good idea. Someone adding bits like this well will, I hope, lead the prime editors to up their game and use citations more. The VC and GC is a great idea but I hope you won't just restrict it to public schools ... these people make the "comp" notable!. Their is an online database of VC winners but it gives birthplace .. but not schools ... but I notice that their are two books that claim to name names.
- Oh trivia ... Repton school has a prep school called Foremarke Hall ... which also has a train named after it
- Other trivia - there is a school in India at Lucknow that was given "battle honours" in 1930 for its student's role in the Indian mutiny Victuallers 09:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Victoria College
Hello. Thanks for the work on Vic. For the cat:, the School itself is not an OV (Old Victorian) so shouldn't be in the Old Victorians category - but the category page contains a link to the Vic article.
The status of the school is slightly bizarre in that it is owned by the public, but a member of HMC. The existence of a fee-paying sector within States-provided education in Jersey sometimes seems odd to outsiders. Until the establishment of the governing body a few years back, the school was directly under the control of the Education Committee, but it is much more of an autonomous institution now than it was (but that goes for States education generally, under the new regime of governing bodies).
BTW, I'm not certain that Queen Victoria can be described as being the Founder without being somewhat misleading. What do you think? Man vyi 11:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've put in a link to the cat: As for the founder, it was the States. The Loi (1860) au sujet du Collège Victoria comments that the school was erected by the States and the administrators of impôts (as explained in the article, the States didn't have full control over educational provision until 1921).
- BTW, helpful wiki-hint - you can sign and date your comments easily by typing 4 tildes at the end of what you write, like I'm about to do here: Man vyi 05:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Commercial use of Image:Efficiency-Medal.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Efficiency-Medal.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Efficiency-Medal.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Efficiency-Medal.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Commercial use of Image:Efficiency-Medal-rev.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Efficiency-Medal-rev.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Efficiency-Medal-rev.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Efficiency-Medal-rev.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Efficiency Medal
Hi Kwib. You are off to such a great start on the article Efficiency Medal that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. Appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 18:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] George Stainforth
Hi Kwib. You are off to such a great start on the article George Stainforth that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. Appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 02:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Efficiency Medal
--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 06:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] George Stainforth
--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 17:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List of Old Alleynians
Longer lists like this are hard to know how to manage. I noticed you were reorganizing this list and also doing some work on the Old Wellingtonians. At the Old Greshamians list, I have ended up with quite a simple structure - you may like the header Public life, which catches some people who are hard to put in a small box of their own, like ambassadors. The List of notable Old Marlburians is very like the Old Alleynians approach.
So far, I see the Old Carthusians list is simply chronological, like the four lists of Old Etonians, while the lists of Old Harrovians and the Old Rugbeians are simply in alphabetical order. There clearly isn't any norm yet! Xn4 02:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- My reply is on your talk page Kwib 12:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- Hi. Yes, I noticed you have been adding VCs and GCs. We are up to similar things.
-
- Seems to me that for now Mark Clarke is a borderline case. Usually, political candidates aren't notable, but leading a national political youth movement might give him a claim. I should have thought that so long as he has a Wikipedia article, you might decide to include him?
-
- regards, Xn4 21:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Victoria Crosses
Did you read my nomination on AfD? The two subjects have little relationship to each other. Corvus cornix 21:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List of Victoria Crosses by School
I am not sure whether you are aware but this article that you created has been nominated for deletion. The nomination can be seen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Victoria Crosses by School. You are most welcome to join the debate about its deletion just make sure that you make it known that you are the creater of it. Thankyou. Woodym555 21:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- With regards to the article, why are the school wikilinks in the notes section bold? It seems strange to me, i have never seen it before. This was a minor question about the article and has no bearing on the AFD which is why i am asking you here. Thanks Woodym555 20:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- I see what you mean. There is no need for the wikilinks to be bold and I will amend this. The reason, I think, is that I built up the initial list in excel and then wrote some formulas to create the text for the wiki table. I believe that I mistakenly added the three inverted comments at the beginning of that wikilink. Simple as that really.Kwib 12:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- With regards to the article, why are the school wikilinks in the notes section bold? It seems strange to me, i have never seen it before. This was a minor question about the article and has no bearing on the AFD which is why i am asking you here. Thanks Woodym555 20:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] St Bees School
Hello there. I started work on a new article some months ago but was plagued by the dearth of recent information, despite being an alumnus of the school. I neglected several parts of the history due to exams, and the same with the 3 VC winners. I'm currently on business in the United States and therefore have no access to my history of St Bees School which I planned to cite to Kingdom come, although if time allows I might utilise the village website's fine history to make the page current. Of course, feel free to take whatever you want from the page. Time I had another look at it I think. Nice to see the new Old St Beghians Category in being. --Harlsbottom 23:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AB - disambiguation style
Thank you for your work on AB. Unfortunately, disambiguation pages do not follow the same stylistic rules as normal pages. In particular,
- there should be only one live link per entry.
Please see the disambiguation style guide for more information. If you have any questions not answered there, drop me a note or try the help desk. By the way, I have already brought AB into line with the guidelines. Fourohfour 18:04, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for bringing the entry into line with guidelines and for letting me know what they are. I have made a few other such entries and I will endeavour to tidy them in line with guidelines also.Kwib 00:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Template nomination for deletion
Hello, you were the creator or a main contributor to one of the following templates which has been nominated for deletion: Template:Infobox UK schools, Template:Infobox UK school, Template:Infobox College GB and Template:Infobox English Public School. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the templates' entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. CR7 19:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tulse-Hill-School-Badge.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tulse-Hill-School-Badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kg and Kg (disambiguation)
Regarding this edit, the Kg disambiguation page has been at Kg (disambiguation) for a long time. I'm not sure if the dablink at the top of Kilogram got erased or what, but I've just now fixed it up. Please make any further changes at Kg (disambiguation). Thanks! Ewlyahoocom 05:34, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kg for King
Hello. It would be helpful if you could find at least one article (disambiguation pages are not articles) that contains this information, then we could link to that from the disambiguation page. Ewlyahoocom 00:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Norwood School (Bethesda, Maryland)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Norwood School (Bethesda, Maryland), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Norwood School. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 20:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- For the record, what you need to do is
- Move the original page to the new name
- Edit the now-created redirect (at the old name) into a disambig.
- The way you did it looses the article edit history, which is a big GFDL no-no. That specific operation (move, then put the disambig back) was already done this time, but you'll save yourself some grief in the future if you do it that way. :-) — Coren (talk) 22:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dulwich College Visitor
I am unaware of the position of the Archbishop of Canterbury as visitor to the school. Indeed, putting it in such a prominent position in the infobox seems a trifle unecessary, as it is giving an unecessary level of emphasis to a position that is perhaps historical, and yet meaningless today. (Indeed, I can definately say he has never visited the school - at least as archbishop) He is not mentioned in any of the schools publications. Feel free to correct me. Bensonby 13:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Strand School
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Strand School, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.aim25.ac.uk/cgi-bin/search2?coll_id=3071&inst_id=6. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Strand School
--GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 13:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Brighton-college-armsmotto.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brighton-college-armsmotto.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:35, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Optime (disambiguation)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Optime (disambiguation), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Optime. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:20, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] October 2007
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that recently you carried out a copy and paste page move from Optime to Optime (disambiguation). Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. — madman bum and angel 22:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:KingsburyHighSchoolBadge.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:KingsburyHighSchoolBadge.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Blundells Crest.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Blundells Crest.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Eastbourne college crest.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eastbourne college crest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Downside-School-Arms.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Downside-School-Arms.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Trains & Schools
Please take note of the fact that more than one editor is reverting your additions to the public school articles. The fact that trains were named after the schools is relevant at the train article, but not at the article on the school itself. At best, you could create a new category so it appears at the bottom of the article, but it definitely does not deserve a huge paragraph in the article itself. Doctor Boogaloo (talk) 13:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:MarlboroughCollege-Arms.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:MarlboroughCollege-Arms.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)