From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Blocked
--Akhilleus (talk) 14:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I am neither a sockpuppet nor a meatpuppet. I note also that the reason given for justification of blocking my account is incorrect. I have not used User:Rogerfgay's machine / IP address for posting at Wikipedia. Our machines are on the same LAN, but we work / post from two different machines with two different IP addresses."
Decline reason: "Confirmed meatpuppet, see here where Rogerfgay admis to using you as a meatpuppet. — Yamla 21:08, 20 June 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I see how the above conclusion has been reached. I also admit that I came to be an editor at Wikipedia for the first time in support of Rogerfgay's position re: fair-use of an image. Being new, I was not aware that would be looked upon as something really bad. (I know that Rogerfgay is also fairly new to Wikipedia and that he didn't seen any problem with it. He freely admitted what he had done as well. ) But I appeal on the basis of Wikipedia guidelines: "In general, meatpuppets used to e.g. sway a deletion debate need not be blocked; they should simply be ignored unless they get disruptive. Meatpuppets have been known to turn into productive editors." Source: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet#Meatpuppets I have not been disruptive and have learned from the experience of being labeled as a meatpuppet."
Decline reason: "[1] prooves that you're likely his sock. MaxSem 12:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.