Talk:Kushboo Sundar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikiproject Indian cinema This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian cinema, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Indian cinema. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is maintained by the Kerala workgroup.
This article is maintained by the Karnataka workgroup.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to actors and filmmakers on Wikipedia.

Well This is about the recent issue that has been burning in Tamil Nadu, for what Kushboo said about Pre-Marietal sex. Here are my views.

Kushboo's views were basically interpreted wrongly. Kushboo was NOT wrong in my opinion. And she didn’t say anything against Tamil/Indian culture. Though I can explain in depth, the summary will only be the following,

[] Kushboo has NEVER ment to have sex with multiple persons. And she only has said pre-marietal sex is not wrong with the loving partner

[] Marriage is NOT the requirement for having sex, because, sex is the extremity of love as evident from Thirukural, Agathinai Padalgal [supposed to be the mirror of Tamil culture beyond any question], which were written 2000+ years back.

[] Marriage is ONLY a social formality, to announce the society that the concerned couple will be together. Announcement is different from asking permission. I strongly believe that bondage due to "love" between the couple is stronger/persistent/ever lasting than bondage due to "social formality" such as marriage.

[] Virginity [in my opinion] is NOT LOST even if you have pre-marietal sex with your partner. Virginity is by heart.

[] Virginity is common for both boy and girl. When a boy is not virgin, he has no right to expect his partner as virgin.


[rajkumar] rajkumar@eml.cc


The following changes are made to this article. The part where its mentioned she was misquoted is removed, as she was misinterpreted.

The public was vehemently against such moral policing. Tamil Nadu has been one of the most forward states in India about women rights and rationalist thinking.



The above two lines have been REMOVED. There is no proof for the first, and the second sentence in my opinion, with due respect is hogwash. What evidence can presented for this, I can cite many examples to prove how TN has been BACKWARD as far as women are concerned. I think still think in no way could TN be called a forward as far as gender-equality is concerned.