User talk:Kuru

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kuru's Talk Page

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Please note that I will usually respond on this page to keep the conversation together. If you have a question about a particular edit/reversion, please try to include a link to it if you can.

Click HERE to start a new talk topic.

Archives:


Contents

[edit] New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 02:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Happy Holidays

The Roman aquadux in china.
The Roman aquadux in china.

[edit] Bstar

The Working Man's Barnstar
Your dutiful reversion of vandalism edits to NBA articles on my watchlist is most splendid! Chensiyuan (talk) 02:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! It's that time of year, I suppose. I'm glad you're around doing the heavy lifting. Kuru talk 20:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thanks for reverting the attack on my talk page! --Bonadea (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

I really appreciate all the help you are giving by sorting out the Kinross page. It is so frustrating constantly having to check up on the page because it is always being vandalised, with the same story over and over again! Thanks again for having my back! :) I am sam the man (talk) 15:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. I'm usually much more conservative on the page protections, but that was some nasty stuff. Kuru talk 20:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Newark Bears (1926-1949)

The graphical nature of the notice might have confused the bot, but I have no excuse (especially since it was on the page TWICE -- top and bottom). I'll be more careful in the future. – PranksterTurtle (talk) 23:20, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

It's absolutely not a problem - you're doing great work in an often neglected and sometimes complex portion of wikipedia. Thanks for your help! Kuru talk 22:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Remove history please

I'm requesting you remove one of the kinross page's history, as it has been deemed offensive. If you cannot, could you please edit it to a blank page. Thanks, . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.157.73 (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

It would appear most of the history of that article has already been oversighted. If there is something specific that needs to be changed, please let me know. Kuru talk 22:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

for reverting vandalism to my user page. Happy editing! Oda Mari (talk) 16:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Gb

Thank you for the revert...GBT/C 17:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] petabyte

You have deleted my Guiness Book of Record posting for BMMsoft, Sybase and Sun. This was not advertising or spam and video from Youtube was a video where we received a reward as well as picture of reward that proved official testing results. We have set new benchmarks in industry and they should be noted. We can do tasks previously impossible and we state that as the fact, not bragging or advertising. We are really sorry that wasn't our intention

Please respond. Fauxstar (talk) 22:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Please read our guidelines on reliable sources, neutral point of view, and, apparently, conflicts of interest. You're adding a paragraph of bluster to several loosely related articles with claims that are not supported at all, or are supported by your own press release. You're welcome to improve our articles, but not to simply promote your company. Thanks. Kuru talk 22:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Sir,
with all due respect Guinness Book of World Records is a neutral party whose job is to verify if someone's claim is true or not true and if it qualifies to be a world record.
We are the ONLY 3 companies in the world officially acknowledged, tested and verified by Guinness and certification institution to create such large and functional Data Warehouse. So please don't call our posting "claims that are not supported at all". JPG. file submitted was a proof , picture of award - issued from NEUTRAL party what is Guinness Books of World Records.
Therefore I kindly ask you to give me a permit to put that award picture back on petabyte page. That is a well deserved proof of our claim from neutral side.
We are trying to promote achievement we're proud of as well as we try to note the new benchmark in industry.
We promise we will do our best to avoid over-posting or any advertising remarks, but petabyte page is very important in the light of the above mentioned.

Best Regards

Fauxstar (talk) 23:13, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

You seem to have deliberately missed the "or supported by a press release". Simply provide cites from third party sources, or simply allow someone not associated with the company to do so. Again, this is not the place to promote your company. Thanks. Kuru talk 23:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC)


To fix the above I have added Official "Audit Report" from 3rd party to verify claims. Is that good enough? Please let me know.

Thanks in advance

Fauxstar (talk) 23:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Sounds better - thanks for clearing it up. I'll take a look at it when I get time and try to combine your addition with the similar section at the bottom of that page. Kuru talk 03:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)


Thank you. I am happy that we could make you happy. Would you please be so kind to let us post the picture of official certificate from Guinness book of records?

Best

Fauxstar (talk) 08:35, 19 May 2008 (UTC)


Someone has deleted our Petabyte benchmark that was marked by Guiness book of world records. Would you please look into it.

Best
Fauxstar (talk) 06:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


I've found out it was one of your editors thinking this system is not in use and available. I included Sun's link showing availability of appliance.

Best

Fauxstar (talk) 07:25, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TOV

I'm planning on sending an abuse report to that IP's ISP, just so you know Alex.Muller 00:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I really hate death threats, lots of users have left because of that. I hope this gets fixed, that person can't get away with this due to the fact he/she lives in US and that's against the law here in US. Antonio Lopez (talk) 02:09, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the hand, Alex. I usually just roll my eyes at that stuff. Kuru talk 03:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Here's an apparent sockpuppet of Abanza (talk · contribs) who you indefinitely blocked (he's been vandalising my user page again): Abanzino (talk · contribs). Thanks. ITAQALLAH 22:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

So it seems - fixed. Kuru talk 23:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List_of_project_management_software

Why do additions to List_of_project_management_software always get removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.185.23.250 (talk) 01:16, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

When you edit the page, the first thing you should see is "IF YOU DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THIS MESSAGE, YOUR EDIT WILL BE ROLLED BACK WITHOUT WARNING. Only place entries here that are links to actual Wikipedia articles about notable project management software. External links, redlinks, substubs, non-notable sites or sites that are not project management software will be removed. If you have questions, use the talk page. Please try to keep entries in alphabetical order. Adding unnecessary links or text to any other section (such as the "References" section) will also be removed. Thanks. Please see "Wikipedia:Notability" for information on notability for Wikipedia." Kuru talk 01:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Thank you

Appreciated. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:48, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hi Kuru

You have deleted this page under G11. I thought of contributing so that I went to company site and got these details just like other company page like accenture, Mcdonalds,etc... I have nothing to do with the company and no intention of advertising or promoting. I just want to form a page with some useful information.

All I have included in the page is just neutral point of view about the company nothing promoting the company.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Satyam_Integrated_Engineering_Services

Can you please help how should a page be framed to be included. Thanx a lot < math > Insertformulahere</math> —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebenezer (talk • contribs) 08:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello Sebenezer. Phrases such as "with the best-in-class resources and proven processes ", "the premium engineering solution provider", "unique delivery models provide clients with comfort", "innovation is not a choice but a must", and literally dozens of others are non-neutral ad-speak. If you'd like to try again, please include independent, third party citation for any facts and figures stated in the article. As written, the article was blatant spam, and your attempt to add deceptive links to it in other unrelated articles did not help. Thanks. Kuru talk 11:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pentaho

I Kuru,

Why you consider information spam in the Pentaho article ?

Please note that Pentaho has created a new trend in the web about the growth of open-BI. Pentaho is first of all an open project, so I think is important to give informations about the born of new tools.

Theese are also pertinent because

1) Jrubick: Implement a non-web OLAP client 2) Ramsetcube: Implement a new conception of cube designer

Not quoting this informations seems like to protect Pentaho business. I think is important to specify that there are third-parts projects that concern the platform and that can collaborate in the development of open-BI.

The mentioned tools infact are among a series of other one that not present interesting technical news.

The reader could be interested in evaulate also the world that gravitates arout Pentaho to understand that there is a new trend in the web.

Note that I tried to change this information in the article by excluding external links.


Thank you very much.

[edit] Removing celebs

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2559309/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilballerak (talk • contribs) 05:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] sorry about the edit conflict

Figured the unblock was redundant, given the extension to indefinite. Might also need protection of that talk page, due to excessive unblock requests. I had the user watchlisted because it had been vandalizing my talk page. Enigma message 03:07, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem - I just wanted to be official about it. From the pattern I saw on all of his sock accounts, the next step will be the pejorative laced rant about it not being him. The edit targets and recurring content disputes made it pretty clear it was him, but I'll let another admin concur if he requests it. Kuru talk 03:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Not familiar with the history here. Did the previous versions also edit war on Kobe Bryant? Seemed like that was his sole purpose here. Enigma message 03:14, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Si. Including some of the exact same edits. Chris's patience is astounding. Kuru talk 03:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] sorry

sorry kuru if an error was made on accountancy, but I do not recall making an edit on that article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.48.196.138 (talk) 19:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)