User talk:Kurmaa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Kurmaa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Christopher Parham (talk) 02:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Apology

Sorry about that tag! Being tired and having many windows open, I failed to notice the user: prefix and assumed this was a vanity article. I sincerely and humbly apologize for this vandalism of your page. Ignoscere mihi and happiest editing in the future. СПУТНИКССС Р 03:00, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks :-') Kurmaa 23:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Assam

I admit I know abosultely nothing about the subject matter. I am not doubting your notes as being correct. I'm just asking you to please not insert them in that format into the article. If you feel that the article is wrong, can you please make the changes necessary to correct the article? It's not encyclopedic to include editor notes in an article and especially to sign them. Thanks. tv316 03:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Actually I am disappointed seeing misuse/misrepresent of Kamrupi matter for others' benefit. Kurmaa 23:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Soapbox

Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Please stop inserting nonencyclopedic content into Assam. --Improv 06:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Kurmaa, please start discussing your changes on Assam. You're soapboxing and mixing up the function of talk pages with article pages. It is important that you stop doing this, or you will be given temporary blocks until a discussion starts. I hope that's not necessary. --Improv 21:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
    • I've removed it once again. This is your last warning. If you continue to reinsert your comments into the article without discussing them either here or on the talk page, you will be given short blocks. tv316 23:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

But it looks like Wikipedia a soapbox seeing what have you been doing in Assam page on Kamrupi :-')

  • Some write papers to get their Ph.D. with lies that are great stuff for you
  • So you do not hesitate to give new meanings to words of a language still spoken
  • Is this not Wikipedia soapbox?
  • This Wikipedia soapbox stuff appeared in a message board called assamonline in yahoogroups
-')

Kurmaa 23:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

  • What for have you warned?
  • Are you asama maluka jaalandhar garuchur?
  • Or are you a maluka murukha?
  • Who are you to mutilate messup Kamrupi matter?

Kurmaa 23:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Who deleted my note on kurmaa?
  • Was that you too ?

Kurmaa 23:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

  • I have deleted a section from Assam page.
  • I warn you if you misuse/misrepresent Karupi for your benifit/sinister purpose you will not be happy (because Kamrupi people will nt be happy).

Kurmaa 23:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

I admit that I know nothing about the material. You aren't being warned for trying to edit the article. Please feel free to make the changes to the article that you believe are wrong. You were warned for adding in your personal notes into the article and signing them on the article page. I even tried to reach a compromise by hiding the text from the article view, but not from the edit box. Also, please refrain from making threats against other Users on Wikipedia. Thanks. tv316 23:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

  • But did you understand my warning asama maluka?
  • I deleted a section from Assam page and do not go add that section, if you add make sure you represent correct Kamrupi meaning.

Kurmaa 23:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Restore deleted text from Assam

Hi Kurmaa, I have restored the passage that you have deleted from the Assam page. It displays the use of the word "asama", the very first use of the word in Assam and elsewhere. The meaning of the word "maluka" is not important. Most scholarly work that I have seen refer to that passage as the first mention of the word "asama". It is appropriate in that context. It shows disrespect to no one, just reflects what is accepted in scholarship. --- Chaipau 01:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Following is not opinion but fact:

  • maluka is not an ethnic group, you do not find them
  • asama is also not an ethnic group. so you should not be writing to propaget incorrect meaning
  • Now do you understand why language is important?

You cannot put a section of the sloka for your purpose. You need to display entire sloka and explain the meaning.

You want to tell the world you are scholar tell something else please leave Kamrupi alone

Kurmaa 04:44, 27 March 2006 (UTC)