Talk:KSDK
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Television Stations, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Television stations. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis, a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | |
This how article is 50% an ad for KDSK. Clearly someone at that station is writing it. This is an encyclopeida not an ad. Someone needs to take out all this hype and giberish. It appears no other St Louis stations have all this slanted information "celebrating" how great the station is and it is written like a commerical. For example "Not surprising since KDSK is a leader..."
[edit] Logo gallery
Apparently, Wikipedia user A Man In Black is removing the logo galleries from the station websites, presumably because he believes they are cruft. I disagree. The KSDK entry has extraneous info, but I think that logo galleries are an interesting view of a station's history. Anybody agree/disagree? Crooow 17:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I agree about the logo galleries, I think that every effort should be made to include them on station pages. However, I'm not sure about the copyright info on any of the logos, so I don't know about the legality of including them.
As far as extraneous info, the KSDK page is definitely too long (33 kilobytes). Maybe the awards section should be completely removed. It isn't up-to-date, and it takes up a lot of space (I would imagine). I also highly doubt that many people care, or would even take the time to read it. However, while some of the other info may be superfluous, much of it is relevant. Hazel2410 22:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- About the awards section, would it hurt splitting it into its own article (Awards given to KSDK-V or something like that)? I'll put a notice in the article. J Klein talk tome!!!! 22:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Since I've heard no opposition to splitting the awards section into a separate article, I'm going to create a new article. I've also added an out-of-date tag on it, but I'm going to also add the 2006 awards (sure the 2007 awards haven't been announced). When I get around to it I might add the other St. Louis station awards to the articles (or new articles, depending on the length of the articles. talk to J Klein 23:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Removal of Links
Recently, KSDK’s page has undergone some major changes, mostly having to do with the page’s organization and appearance. These are my own personal thoughts on these changes:
1.) The removal of all the links in the “personalities” section (and the use of boldface to highlight the names) seems like a step backward because many of the personalities (especially the past personalities) have their own page, to which their name is no longer linked (what is the point of the personal pages if their name can’t be linked to it?). Though it does create some uniformity with the other St. Louis TV station pages, in my opinion, this change does not improve the page overall. I think the links to both the personal pages, and pages of the stations where the people are currently working, should be re-added to this page (and probably the same to done to the other pages, as well).
2.) The reorganization of the page and the creation of the “Awards” page are, in my opinion, well done (although, I did make a few minor changes).
Does anyone else have any thoughts/opinions? Hazel2410 23:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ksdk.gif
Image:Ksdk.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
