Talk:Kroll Inc.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Business and economics Portal
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Stub rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Ad

This phrase, "most acclaimed", sounds like an advertisement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.51.240 (talk) 13:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
I agree, the following should be removed unless there is a consensus against removing it: "the nation's most acclaimed investigative firm, to ask him if he could inquire, through the extensive range of former law enforcement officials employed by him".PeetMoss (talk) 13:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Stunned

"I was stunned", said Abrams. This also sounds like an ad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.209.102 (talk) 10:57, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Having an influential person speak highly of a subject does not make it an ad. Just like having an influential person speak lowly of a subject does not make it a hit piece. An ad would be if the text describing the organization itself called it "stunning", as if Wikipedia said it, instead of Floyd Abrams. --David Shankbone 16:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Verifiability

{{Request edit}} I am an employee of the Corporate Communications department at Kroll, and am looking for help from some experienced editors to clean up this page. Content that is not cited / verifiable should be removed. I can assist further in adding appropriate and relevant content, but would like to avoid conflict of interest issues. KR-Communications (talk) 19:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you have any items you wish removed as a matter of priority? - Crosbiesmith (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits thus far. I would note that the Abrams quote contains an error ("Jules Kroll" was the CEO of Kroll Associates, not "Matt Kroll"). Also, any additions of Kroll's general corporate information, history, services, and/or notable cases, are appreciated. (see About Kroll) The scattered information currently in the entry does not accurately represent Kroll's business. KR-Communications (talk) 21:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out that error. I agree the article is little more than a collection of scattered facts right now. I hope someone will take some time to write a better article. Obviously, we cannot simply cut and paste your copyright material. Regards - Crosbiesmith (talk) 22:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I understand. Thanks again. KR-Communications (talk) 22:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)