Talk:Krogoth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
I fail to see a need for this article. Do we need an individual article for each unit in TA? The article is well done, but seems unnecessary. --Allen 04:50, Oct 11, 2004 (UTC)
Me too. This should either be merged with The Core Contingency, or deleted. bjelleklang 23:06, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
i think its because the Krogoth was such a popular unit when TACC came out that they made this article, although Id prefer it if it were merged with the main article for TACC. although if theres nothing else called krogoth, why not have a seperate article for it? (obviously you wouldn't have articles for all the TA units, its just the Krogoth is the most well known)
I don't think it's unreasonable having a separate article for the Krogoth, it's a particularly notable unit. I suspect the only other unit that is mentioned more often in discussions of TA is the Arm "Flash" tank (though instead of an article for the Flash we could just redirect it to Zerging instead :). Bryan 23:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WTF is with this orcone/kryptokarganehtheorzorz shit?
seriously, if you are going to include shitty third party counter parts, include the millions of other equally notable (read:not notable) one too. having only these three serves only as advertisement
