User talk:Kriplozoik

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with TVMAN. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

  1. Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
  2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. DUBJAY04 06:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Tvman.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tvman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ByteMap Font

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article ByteMap Font, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Psychonaut 04:12, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cracker_bmf_by_raist.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cracker_bmf_by_raist.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 20:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] image on Judaism's view of Jesus

I removed Image:Iesus-Nazarenus.jpg from the article Judaism's view of Jesus because I did not feel it added anything to the article. I have started a conversation on the topic at Talk:Judaism's view of Jesus#New image, and you are welcome to comment there.

I noticed that you are new to wikipedia. Let me be the first to welcome you. I know that it can be frustrating to new editors when they try to contribute but it seems like everyone is intent on removing their contributions. It can help to read The five pillars of Wikipedia, Help pages, How to write a great article, and Manual of Style. If you need any help or have any questions you can contact me on my talk page. Jon513 18:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Hey, I have noticed that this thing seems to be escalating so here is a deal: I removed the notice for the sake of WP:AGF, and the fact that the link was placed on the talk page of the article really warrants good faith and makes my giving you a warning extremely over-reactive. Consider this an apology. But please, try to understand that there are many active spammers on wiki and I was just trying to help; in other words, also try to see the good faith on my side. Soap tends not to be a big deal but it is good to know. I hope we are fine now because it really makes no sense to waste time commenting on each other's talk pages about trivialities. Happy editing, Brusegadi 00:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

You did it again (in Petrodollar warfare), dude :-( Kriplozoik 02:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)