Talk:Korherr Report

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hopefully you know that Korherr never belonged to the SS and so could never be chief inspector of the statistical bureau of the SS.

---

Using this as holocaust evidence seems to pivot on the use of "code words". In and of itself it seems meaningless. If you say a certain word means something else then you can get whatever you need out of it - but then with a code you don't need it in the first place.

The intrepretation given to the K Report seems to imply that someone was trying to deceive Hitler - is this ending up saying that proHolocausters believe Hitler didn't know about the Holocaust. Not what I thought we wanted to conclude. Making up a story about code words in the K Report seems to destroy other more vital stories. Please rewrite this - call in Nitzor/big guns? ( this is going to require some thought ). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.105.80.219 (talk • contribs)

Glad to see some editor has removed the part about Hitler not knowing about the Holocaust. However, the Korherr reort seems to match the Wannassee Protocol - reduce the number of Jews in Europe. Was this a progress report back to whoever was in charge of the Wannassee plan? or to a labor supply board? It is very short on homicidal evidence.159.105.80.63 16:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

The Simon Wiesenthal Center has a good article on Korherr. He worked for the SS - more as a consultant - but never was SS, etc. Of interest is that his collaborator was a Dr Simon - a Jew - on his reports ( ouch).159.105.80.141 (talk) 12:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)