Talk:Kopi Luwak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag Kopi Luwak is part of WikiProject Indonesia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Please do not substitute this template.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Indonesian WikiProjectIndonesian notice boardIndonesian WikiPortal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
 WikiProject Southeast Asia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Southeast Asia-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article falls within the scope of the Brunei work group. If you are interested in articles relating to Brunei, please visit the project page to see how you can help.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality, if possible.
Wikipedians in Indonesia may be able to help!

Contents

[edit] Weasel words

Some of this article's authors are doubtless the same online realtors who go to such length to avoid explicit description of the coffee's production process. The beans don't just magically appear outside the animal's body as if beamed with a Star Trek transporter. The coffee is, literally, poo. Delicious poo, I'm sure, but also proof that you can get so-called connoisseurs to buy anything just by charging enough for it. By the way, look for my new line of Pre-Digested Corn Kernel Snacks at your local gourmet grocer's in 2007! Happy New Year!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.43.106 (talkcontribs)

Do other animals add their own enzymes to coffee beans? has anyone tried this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.163.101.9 (talkcontribs) .

If I could get my hands on some of those berries... I would try it. I guess that would mean I'd have to take a dump in the back yard. Maybe I should put up a fence first... to keep the neighbor's dog out... so he wouldn't eat it... and I wouldn't go picking through the wrong ones. Maybe I should try gorging on cherries first... pits and all... just to see how it feels going down. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.173.85.221 (talk • contribs) .

[edit] Cruelty

I have read that (but do not have a handy source) kopi luwak is intensively "farmed", with civets being force-fed beans, much like geese are to make foie gras. Does anyone have a source for this? Seems like it would be a relevant addition. adamrice 23:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

I've heard that as well, but the only "source" I have is a friend who like coffee. Doctorfluffy 20:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCG31fSAr4M&feature=related this video is not about cruelty, but you can see a kopi luwak farm here. I suppose the beasts are not happy to leave in these cages. I think, "foie gras feeding" is too sophisticated procedure. It's much easier to have more civets and feed them with coffee only. --D'Arahchjan (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Source for price, commercial links

Hmm, coffeebreakgourmet.com is definitely a verifiable source that someone is selling the stuff at that price (they are), but on the other hand we can't really link to it in good conscience, because they'll get more traffic from Wikipedia readers and it isn't fair to the other companies selling Kopi Luwak. It seems like we're endorsing them. What should we do? —Keenan Pepper 01:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

I've bought a 50g jar of Cafe Alamid (at Bo's Coffee house) here in Manila and it set me back 550P or just over USD10. How one could pay $50 for a cup is beyond me!
Found some kopi luwak for sale at Alun-Alun in the Grand Indonesia mall in Jakarta today. Rp 200,000 (~US$20) for Balinese, Rp 250.000 for Sumatran. Not sure about the gram count, but it was preground and supposed to be enough for one pot. Jpatokal (talk) 12:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Safe to Drink?

Is it actually safe to drink this stuff? It's basically feces. Do they clean o sterilize it somehow?--Richy 12:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

As far as I know it is quite safe. The beans are undigested, although slightly changed by the process, so it isn't feces. I think you have some research to do to edit the article to answer your question better. *grins* - UtherSRG (talk) 21:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Partially digested/Undigested?

I changed part of the first paragraph to reflect the fact that while the bean passes through the animal's digestive system, it is undigested when it comes out the other end (the berry is digested). This matches my understanding of the topic and is also in line with later sentences in the article. Does anyone disagree? The original sentence read "The animals gorge on the ripe berries, and excrete the partially-digested beans, which are then harvested for sale." I replaced with "The civets eat the berries but the beans inside pass through their system undigested." Katwin 20:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] History

How the heck did anyone think about making coffee of those beans? Is it known? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.12.106.109 (talk) 10:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Ig Nobel" prize

This is trivia. It's information about the prize, not about the coffee. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Artificial enzymes?

"A hypothesis to justify this coffee's reputation proposes that the beans are of superior quality before they are even ingested; though this is not to say that the digestive enzymes play no role."

Personally, I find the superior coffee "hypothesis" to be more believable than the digestive enzyme "hypothesis". The wild civets are apparently choosy about the berries they ingest. Observation of this behavior would also help explain why the coffee came into existence in the first place-- Some people must have observed that the civet passes only high quality, ripe beans (the civets' sense of smell might be important here?) Though the beans may be "lightly" roasted-- they are still washed and exposed to high temperatures. To me there is a suspicious slant towards accepting this simulated process as legitimate in this article. The company applying the artificial digestive process has a lot at stake. More citations would be helpful Cuvtixo (talk) 03:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] University of Guelph experiments--not very good?

from Univ. of Guelph web reference "But the big question was whether passing through the GI tract of the Luwak really makes Kopi Luwak coffee beans different from regular beans. So, Marcone and other members of his department completed a series of tests on the Kopi Luwak beans and compared them with Columbian beans, which were used as a control." That's not good- they need to be compared to beans from the same area. At the very least, compared to other Indonesian beans, not beans from an entirely different continent. Cuvtixo (talk) 04:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kopi Muncak

Where is the citation for Kopi Mucak, where it comes from a barking deer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roseynose (talkcontribs) 21:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


What the heck are you talking about? I ask, my good chum, because your question is unclear. And if it's unclear, how can it possibly be answered? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.27.41.134 (talk) 08:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)