User talk:Komdori
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Sea of Japan
Hi, I made an edit a couple of weeks ago giving reference to the alternative names in the lead. The lead at that stage read (I copied and pasted but there were also wikilinks):
- The Sea of Japan (occasionally referred to as the East Sea) is a marginal sea of the western Pacific Ocean, bordered by Japan, Korea and Russia. Like the Mediterranean Sea, it has almost no tides due to its nearly complete enclosure.
With hindsight, I propose that it should instead have read:
- The Sea of Japan (sometimes referred to as the East Sea) is a marginal sea of the western Pacific Ocean, bordered by Japan, Korea and Russia. Like the Mediterranean Sea, it has almost no tides due to its nearly complete enclosure.
There appears to be consensus for this here, insofar as no editor has explained reservations with Kusunose's proposal, which I had assumed statistically would have happened if there were an objection, based on number of edits to the page and specifically in relation to the matter, and the amount of time that has elapsed since the proposal.
I haven't reverted your edit because I believe discussion should always come before editing, but would like to hear your view on the matter. BeL1EveR 23:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] report
Don't worry, even after my self revert, I was watching the watchlist for familiar immediate-report made by you or your friend. And I already left a comment there too. Good friend100 21:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Need Citation
need publicity source. [1] do you count number of each country's war? please prove it. Yearwaves3 21:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what your point is, could you please explain? --Cheers, Komdori 21:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- "numerous" and "several" mean. did you count how many number of each country's war? please prove it by publicity and trustworthy source.Yearwaves3 21:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, what is your point? Numerous and several both mean just that--more than one. Are you suggesting Goguryeo had only one conflict ever? --Cheers, Komdori 21:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- your edit mean goguryoe was much more war with silla and baekjae than china. we need citation. Yearwaves3 21:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but you have misunderstood the words. I suggest take a look at some of the many excellent online English dictionaries, such as Microsoft's. --Cheers, Komdori 21:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- don't you know "numerous" and "several" mean? your edit mean goguryoe was much more war with silla and baekjae than china. we need citation. cleary you don't know about goguryoe history. you better do not edit goguryeo. you change with out "fact". don't do that. Yearwaves3 21:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- your edit mean goguryoe was much more war with silla and baekjae than china. we need citation. Yearwaves3 21:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, what is your point? Numerous and several both mean just that--more than one. Are you suggesting Goguryeo had only one conflict ever? --Cheers, Komdori 21:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- "numerous" and "several" mean. did you count how many number of each country's war? please prove it by publicity and trustworthy source.Yearwaves3 21:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR reports
Ive never made one before, and Im not sure if I managed to do it correctly.
If you have a spare few mins, would you mind checking my report http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:appletrees_reported_by_User:Sennen_goroshi_.28Result:_.29
and correcting any errors that may or may not be there.
thanks.Sennen goroshi 16:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- It was already evaluated before I noticed it, and they didn't seem to mind the format you used. In general, though, it is better to format your diffs as follows:
- Instead of:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dano_%28Korean_festival%29&oldid=166717371
- use:
- [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dano_%28Korean_festival%29&oldid=166717371 10:21, 24 October 2007]
- which will look like
- This will let someone reviewing your report see the timestamps more clearly and more easily verify exactly how the events occurred. You likely will get a faster response as well. --Cheers, Komdori 18:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome back Komdori
Welcome back, Komdori (talk · contribs) or LactoseTI (talk · contribs)?
You said you and LactosTI work at the same school and friend each other, so it doesn't matter whether 128.205.165.177 (talk · contribs) is you or LactoseTI. I'm glad that I can wrap up something unfinished. Just log in with your account and contribute to Wikipedia because we need more people's attention to Japan-Korean related articles, really. Cheers!--Appletrees (talk) 14:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)