Komidashi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Komi (コミ?) in the game of go are points added to one player's score as compensation for playing as White. Komidashi (コミ出し?) is the more complete Japanese language term. Komi is known as Deom (덤) in Korean.
Contents |
[edit] Whole number and halves
Conventional komi in most competitions is a half-integer such as 6.5 points. This is convenient and the prevailing usage for tournaments, since it rules out a tied game (jigo in Japanese) and rematches. In a club or friendly game this is not a problem, so a value such as 6 points is just as practical. Within a Swiss system draw, tied games are not inconvenient and tiebreakers are used.
Some argue there is nothing wrong in having a tie. Forbidding a draw may misrepresent one player as superior when there is no clear difference in skill. There is however a hidden parity question which means that a draw may be unlikely. Lately, the Ing Cup has been using an 8 point komi rule in their tournament, but with the rule that if the scores are equal after komi then Black wins, so this is equivalent to 7.5 points.
[edit] History
White is at a disadvantage because Black gets to move first, giving that player sente. Records show that the winning percentage of Black is higher. The importance of playing first was however not dealt with by rule, until the 1930s, and then only tentatively.
The compensation (komi) system was introduced into professional go in Japan as a gradual process of innovation, beginning in the 1930s. The correct value of komi has been re-evaluated over the years, as professional opening strategy has evolved.
At first, komi started as low as 2.5 points or 3 points. It was later increased to 4.5, and then 5.5 points. A komi of 5.5 points was used for a long time, but research found that 5.5 points was insufficient to compensate for White's disadvantage. Statistical analyses of the year's games would sometimes appear in the Igo Nenkan (Kido Yearbook), backing up the intuition of many top players. The use of databases confirmed figures such as 53% victories for Black, not just at the highest level.
Komi was then raised to 6.5. Some events use as high as 7.5 points. Under the Chinese method of counting, the difference between 6.5 and 7.5 point is of minimal effect. (Chinese sources usually in fact quote figures that are halved, such as 2.75 for 5.5, at least for Chinese domestic competitions.)
Handicap games are almost universally played with a komi of 0.5 points. The advantage of playing one or more black stones (the number usually calculated as the difference in player's rank) before the white player's first move constitutes the remainder of the handicap, with the 0.5 komi determining white as winner in games that would otherwise be a draw.
John Fairbairn, a Go historian, has written on the History of Komi.
[edit] Effects on strategy
Since very minor mistakes can cost one point, discussion of the 'true' value for komi makes little sense, except at the level of the top-ranked players in the world. These are (in most cases) also the opening-theory experts, and evaluate opening strategies in practical play against their peers.
The introduction and then increase of komi has led to ever more ambitious or aggressive strategies for Black, the first player. In the days before komi, White as second player had to disrupt the smooth working of Black's classical strategies, described sometimes as aiming for a sure win by 3 points. From the introduction of komi in most pro events, around 1950, Black's older methods had to be reconsidered, since White suddenly needed appreciably less (in pro terms) in secure area. The 3-3 point became an interesting play for White, where previously it appeared experimental, and was developed in particular by Go Seigen and Sakata Eio.
In the following decades a mixture of classical and shinfuseki techniques became normal. The most obvious effect was the replacement of the 4-3 point by the 4-4 point as the most common way to first occupy a corner.
[edit] Fairness of compensation points
It is a hard theoretical problem to determine the best and fairest value of compensation points, because it can be taken to ask for the result of a game of go with best play by both sides. It can be estimated that playing first is equal to about half a move (or a bit more) ahead throughout the game.
[edit] Local variations
Although 6.5 points is a common komi as of 2007; each country, association, and tournament may set its own specific komi:
- In Japan, the usual komi was once about 2.5 points. Some time later, it was raised to 4.5 points. In 1955 the Oza became the first tournament to adopt 5.5. The value of 5.5 became standard over some decades. The Nihon Ki-in decided to change to 6.5 in September 2002.
- In Korea, it used to be 5.5, but is now 6.5.
- In China, 5.5 points was common, but 7.5 is now standard. A value of 6.5 would seldom give a different result from 7.5 due to Chinese scoring rules.
- In America, American Go association (AGA) official rules used to specify 5.5 points, however they later suggested also experimenting with values up to 8.5 points in both informal games and tournaments in order to gather data to determine the effects of increasing U.S. komi officially. The American Go Association changed komi from 5.5 to 7.5 in August 2004, effective 2005.
- The New Zealand rules specify a komi of 7.
- For the Ing Foundation (Ing rules) komi is specified as 8 points. Due to the different counting method used by the Ing system, this komi is equivalent to 7.5 points under the Japanese rules.
[edit] Type of compensation system
[edit] Fixed compensation point system
By far the most common type of komi is a fixed compensation point system. A fixed number of points, determined by the Go organization or the tournament director, is given to the second player (White) in an even game (without handicaps) to make up for first-player (Black) advantage.
[edit] Auction komi
As no one can be absolutely sure of the ideal value for komi, systems without fixed komi are used in some amateur matches and tournaments. This is called auction komi.
Examples of auction komi systems:
- the players do an "auction" by saying: "I am willing to play black against XXX komi" and the player who wins the auction plays black.
- one player chooses the size of the komi, and the other player then chooses to play black or white.
