User talk:Kolt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here's some tips:

  • You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • Remember to use the show preview button before you save a page.
  • If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.

Other useful pages are: Image use policy, how to edit, how to write a great article, naming conventions, manual of style and the Wikipedia policies.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Angela. 12:01, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)

Hi, Why don't you write these facts about Zhukov yourself? Mikkalai 17:38, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Sure, why not. --Kolt 11:14, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I hope you read User:Kolt, particularly the lines in the top! /Tuomas 19:34, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] "mediation"

:-)))

I don't remember to have applied to become a mediator, and as it turned out, you didn't need one either!

It worked out really good, didn't it?
--Ruhrjung 01:55, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Regarding the "continuation" in the Karelian Isthmus article, I don't know how much of a newbie you are here around, but asuming you are, I guess you will change your mind with regard to inserted "by X called" in due time. If there were another name for that war in English, then that would be used in the English wikipedia, regardless of what the Finns call it. However, that's the term used by textbooks on history. The Finns call it either "Fortsättningskriget" or "Jatkosota" depending on mother tongue. But for now, I don't think that it matters much. :)

Another thing is that the southern delimination of the isthmus itches me. I would assume, that the actual istmus (geographically speaking) really continues also on the Russian side of the 1721-border, all the way down to River Neva, although much of that area today might be suburban and urban parts of the Saint Petersburg metropolis.
--Ruhrjung 19:09, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)


Geographically speaking, it would be true that the isthmus covers the northern part of St. Petersburg down to the river Neva. However, when St. Petersburgers talk about going to the Karelian isthmus, say, for the weekend, they mean the non-urban Baltic coastline north of the city. --Kolt 07:36, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)

My last wording Then the northwestern half was transferred, as a part of Old Finland, to the semi-autonomous Grand Duchy of Finland, since 1809 in personal union... is maybe not an example of particulary beautiful English prose. Do with it what you want!
--Ruhrjung 09:26, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Who lost the Karelian Isthmus?

I won't change your last edit, but I hope you know that our Finnish friends make a for them important distinction between the Winter War-losses at the battle field, and the Moscow Peace-losses at the negotiation table. The conscript army was responsible only for the former. Details, details... but don't be chocked if you sooner or later find your choice of words criticized. :->>
--Ruhrjung 18:28, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)


Considering that the post-Winter-War border largely coincided with the actual frontline at the end of the hostilities, could it be that Finns who blame their politicians for poor bargaining in Moscow are not unlike silly Germans who blamed their politicians for losing World War One at the negotiating tables in Compiègne and Versailles? --Kolt 10:22, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Your comment promted me to: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Winter_War&diff=0&oldid=3229047
Cheers!
--Ruhrjung 18:01, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Germans

Well, actually, my chief reason to write you is (with regard to our latest exchange of thoughts at Talk:Battle of Stalingrad#No need to worry) that you might be interested in User:Ruhrjung/Germans, which maybe, if it's possible to reach some kind of consensus among wikipedia-Germans, will replace the current redirect at Germans.

The background is that I for long (a year, actually) have been itched by the way Wikipedia-links are done with often sloppy distinctions between nationality, citizenship and ethnicity (with regard to persons) and also between nations and countries. This is particularly obvious in the case of people or entities that are denoted as German. A link to the Federal Republic of Germany is often outright unhistorical and wrong, but this has until now been the most usual.

Therefore I'm considering an article on Germans, started at the temporary location User:Ruhrjung/Germans. My current idea is to re-link strange [[Germany|German]] to [[Germans|German]]. A problem is however that even among Germans the issue of who is a German, and who is not, is controversial and only uneasily discussed.

Feel free to comments here on your own talk-page or at User talk:Ruhrjung/Germans.

regards!
Ruhrjung 18:28, 15 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation, I agree that a link from the Germans in Stalingrad to the post-1949 FRG is questionable. --Kolt 10:22, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Karelia

I think you is badly needed at Karelia/temp (see: Talk:Republic of Karelia for a background). /Tuomas 21:12, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Tip: you need to put the bold outside the names if you want a bold link: eg '''[[word]]''' looks like word, but [['''word''']] doesn't work: [[word]]. Dysprosia 11:35, 15 May 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Napoleon invasion of Russia 1812

see Talk:Napoleon invasion of Russia 1812

[edit] Image copyright

Hi, I saw you uploaded Image:Lensiege.jpg, an image of soldiers during the siege of Leningrad. It's used at the article siege, which I'm hoping to nominate as a featured article. However, it can't be approved unless all the images have proper sources mentioned on the image page. That's the only one that doesn't have source information. Please edit the image to indicate the source. Thanks for all your help, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 18:35, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lensiege.jpg

Greetings. I have listed Image:Lensiege.jpg on Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion because it has no source or licensing information, and it's not listed in any articles. If you would like this image to be kept, please add source and licensing information, and include it in an article. If you need any help with this, just ask me. Thanks! – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 22:30, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Mamayevkurgan1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mamayevkurgan1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:59, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Stalingrad-a.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stalingrad-a.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Stalingrad-a.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stalingrad-a.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bleh999 11:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)