User talk:Kollision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page! Please feel free to leave a message here, but remember to:

  • Place new messages at the bottom of the page, not at the top. This preserves the chronological order for the page.
  • Separate topic sections with a ==Descriptive header==.
  • Sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~)
  • Unless otherwise noted I will respond on this page, not yours.
Archive
Archives
Image warnings archive


Contents

[edit] Mustard tags

Nope, anybody can remove them. I've took it off the one, but kept it on Real Life (Evermore album) -- I didn't include the References tag for Real Life because References wasn't an option until more recently. Notability's fixed, but there's no References either. If you can add a References section like you did on the other one, just go ahead and remove the tag. Tuf-Kat 14:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GITS

I noticed your edit Moved episode 21 trivia from Armed Suits, and was wondering where you moved it to?--Salvax 19:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

It was actually from Armed Suit. And I put it under 'Episode 21'. As you can see, that trivia doesn't really have to do with Armed Suits. I also trimmed out some irrelevant information, if you look at the previous version of Armed Suits, you'll see it lists the similarities between the two fights. - kollision 01:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanx!--Salvax 19:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Squid and the Whale

Hi

I checked the revert you made, with IMDB and according to them [1], the song is sung by Jesse Eisenberg. Could you clarify why you think it is sung by Dean Wareham? Cheers. -- Funky Monkey  (talk)  18:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Jesse Eisenberg does perform "Hey You" in the movie, but I'm pretty sure the version on the soundtrack is a cover by Dean Wareham. Unless Allmusic and Amazon is wrong. --kollision 23:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Congradulations!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For correcting my god-awful spelling for the first 26 episodes of Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex, located on the page List of Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex episodes, I, TomStar81, herby award you the Barnstar of Diligence. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 07:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Sweet! My first barnstar. Thanks! It was really easy actually thanks to Firefox 2.0's new spellchecking feature. - kollision 07:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spelling and Grammar Award

The TomStar81 Spelling Award
Be it known to all members of Wikipedia that Kollision has corrected my god-awful spelling on the page List of Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex episodes, and in doing so has made an important and very significant contribution to the Wikipedia community, thereby earning this TomStar81 Spelling Award and my deepest thanks. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Relient K articles

Very nice editing on the articles, thanks for helping cleaning them up, it was much needed and I'm not that great at editing.

  • Sweet job on finding the name of that game, i was wondering what it was. I noticed I didn't sign the post above, so i'm signing this one. --DJREJECTED 09:41, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Nice work cleaning up the Relient K articles...again! --DJREJECTED 21:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My Edits

I can cite grammar books that say otherwise and I feel that I should edit this page to set this straight. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Noahdabomb3 (talk • contribs) 04:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC).

    • Thanks for the clarification, but I think that wikipedia's grammar book needs a revision is it is inconsistent. All other grammar styles presented on wikipedia go by the "following suit rule": use American English versus British English in an article on a strictly American (or British) topic, and otherwise just follow suit throughout an article with one style. The quotation section in wikipedia's grammar book however mixes American and British quotation use showing a lack on consistency. I hope that made sense.Noahdabomb3 05:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] AWB

Ah thankyou. I never noticed that.

Thanks!

Bearingbreaker92 | Talk 03:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] My Jamie T edit

Hi, sorry about this edit. I'm not sure what I was actually trying to do but it definitely wasn't that! Mahahahaneapneap 23:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

  • You're alright, you were just trying to revert vandalism, but it went over my edit as well. - kollision 01:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Arctic Monkeys

I went ahead and removed the fact tag, as well as the entire myspace entry pertaining to arctic monkeys. Here it can be found that the band did not even set up their own account. The undertow 09:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Commons POTY identity confirmation

I confirm I am the same user as 220.244.242.47 - kollision 07:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Kollision/bioassessment.js

Hi. Bioassessment.js added musician-work-group=yes and priority=Mid to Talk:The Neptunes. However, the priority parameter has no application for the WPBiography group. Because of the scale of the Biography WikiProject, it was felt that assessing priority across the whole Project would be too much. Thus, the priority ratings only apply only to workgroups, not the Biography project. See the priority parameter usage at Template:WPBiography. Unless you know whether and how the musician-work-group prioritizes its articles, you might want to remove the priority=Mid from Talk:The Neptunes (and, perhaps, remove the priority parameter from bioassessment.js. -- Jreferee 17:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The musician-work-group does prioritize its articles and it's the same scale as outlined at WikiProject Biography/Assessment (ie. Low is notable in their main discipline, Mid is important in their discipline etc.) - kollision 02:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: The Angels (Australian band)‎

Thanks for starting to help clean this up. If you look at the talk page for this article there has been major dramas with a certain user!. --Mikecraig 01:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I know, I've been watching the page since December 2006. I won't be going pass formatting changes and fixing up the album pages (eg. merging Face to Face (The Angels album)] and Face to Face (Angel City - Album)) though. - kollision 02:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Still having dramas with references now, but hopefully he will get the idea and try to do it a bit better --Mikecraig 03:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Architecture in Helsinki.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Architecture in Helsinki.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Powderfinger Banner

Hi. Thanks for your bug fix here. If you get the chance, and if you're ok with templates, could you please try and fix up the bug(ish) with the to-do list. When you click the "show" tab, it stretches the importance marker down (currently the one with "???"). If you are able to, could you change it so that it doesn't stretch down when you click the "show" tab? Thanks. G1ggy! Review me! 23:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bobby Brown Article

Please explain the tag you put on Bobby's "biography and career" section or replace the tag with a more specific tag. Thanks. --In Defense of the Artist 02:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Comparing the version I put the Cleanup tag on and the Current version, the most notable change is that the text has been split into paragraphs, which was one of the reasons for the tag. The Biography section still needs work, mainly it need to be split into subsections and more citations are needed. (see The Game (rapper) I have changed the tags on the article. After looking through the entire history of the article to check for vandalism, deleted information, etc. I have found that the Biography section is mostly a copyvio from All Music Guide, as such I have reverted the section to the last good version (13 July 2006). The article now needs to be rewritten. - kollision 06:38, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] World In Conflict

Hey, i was wondering why you would change the list to prose, i think that the list may look better and easier to understand for people. (Kliu1 10:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC))

I think it looks more professional and is more encyclopedic. No Featured Article would have a list, so why should 'Start' class article have one? (see also Wikipedia:Embedded list) Either way, the Reception section definitely needs to be in prose (see Shadow_of_the_Colossus#Reception and Metal_Gear_Solid_3:_Snake_Eater#Reception for good examples. - kollision 10:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of games using physics engines up for AfD

[edit] AfD nomination of List of games using physics engines

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of games using physics engines, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of games using physics engines. Thank you.

[edit] Eleventyseven

Hey, since you have done good work on the Relient K article, I'd like to ask your help on something. You gave very good reasons for fair use on the Relient K album covers, and I wondered if you could tell me if you know where the cover images are from? I may have added some, I don't really remember. But I need to add Eleventyseven's album covers to their specific articles now that it has been recreated, and I wondered if you could tell me the best choice for getting the covers up there. Thanks in advance, God bless.RoryS89 21:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)RoryS89

I rarely upload album covers, I just add the fair use rationales to them. You can get the album cover from anywhere on the net (amazon, itunes, google images, etc.) It doesn't (and actually shouldn't) have to be in high res. anywhere between 300-550px is fine. In the image description, you should include a brief sentence on what the image is of, the image's source URL, the copyright holder (usually the record label), a fair use rationale, and the licensing template. See Image:Relient K - 5 Score And Seven Years Ago.jpg for an example. - kollision 04:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Eskimo Joe.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Eskimo Joe.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 03:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eskimo Joe.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Eskimo Joe.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:31, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An invitation

I speak on the behalf of Magnus. Magnus is a respected wikipedian, and he invites you personally to join his esteemed clan for he enjoyed your contribution to this page. This will, I assure you, be beneficial to you. If you want to take up this rare oppertunity, you will contact me on MY talk page. Do not contact Magnus himself, he is a very busy man. I must point out that should you contact Magnus directly, your invitation will be voided. I hope to hear from you soon. Kindest regards, D'ragos Morgul (Messenger of Magnus) 13:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Radiohead

Hi, I've put the Radiohead article up for a peer review, and would welcome your opinions on it. Thanks. Atlantik (talk) 21:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Eagle Eye: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Jauerback (talk) 12:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "George Smith" and "2 Krayze" vandal

Hi, kollision! The "George Smith"/"2 Krayze" vandal whose edits you reverted back in September is back, putting his self-promotional crap in Bobby Brown, Perri "Pebbles" Reid, Loose Ends (band) and The Gap Band. I've reverted the edits made by this vandal, put the pages on my watchlist and reported the users involved to WP:WPSPAM. Do you have any information about this? Thanks. Huntthetroll (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Update: He struck again today (from 67.182.72.212), editing here, here, here and here. I've given him a Level 4 warning, and if he makes these edits again I will report him at the Administrators' noticeboard. Huntthetroll (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request For Rollback

I have fullfilled your request. If you have any question please feel free to ask me. Best Wishes. Pedro :  Chat  12:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Little Flames.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Little Flames.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bloc Party logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloc Party logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:25, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] peer review

I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the Heroes (TV series) talkpage and give us an honest peer review. The page has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at the Heroes Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. We have all worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. I you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Heroes (TV series)/archive2--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 05:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Revert

That's weird with the edit I did to Gorillaz, apparently the computer I was using had a filter and automatically removed the profanity. :/ Thanks for the revert, though. Douglasr007 (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] thanks for using my radiohead photos

imagine my surprise when checking out the radiohead article and finding my own photos gracing the page! not only did you use my photos, but you made an excellent job making them look halfway decent! (had a crappy camera back then).

so thanks! you truly made my day.

mz (talk) 18:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting vandalism

Hi there. I noticed you reverted a few vandalism edits from Beenlawsq (talk · contribs). In the future, could you place the appropriate warning tag on the talk page of those users who make inappropriate edits? It makes it easier to track persistent vandals. A list of warning templates can be found here. Thanks! -FrankTobia (talk) 14:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TUSC token 80cd70a10aedddcfdd8550f9af16ca38

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!