Talk:Knightsbridge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the UK Roads WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the UK's road network. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B	This article has been rated as b-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is part of WikiProject London, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to London. If you would like to participate, you can improve the article attached to this page or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Top	This article has been rated as top-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, an attempt at creating a standardised, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on London's transport system. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page or visit the Portal.
B	This article has been rated as b-Class on the assessment scale. (add assessment comments)
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance within the London Transport WikiProject.

To-do list for Knightsbridge:

edit · history · watch · refresh

Here are some tasks you can do: Wikify: Some over linking Cleanup: Boundaries this spills into S.Ken Economy Harvey Nix and Harrods are probably notable, rest probably not History focus and citations extend, development of the area - much of historical property could come here Property needs to focus on types remove prices (enough to say pricey) remove refs to Middle East, Russians and anybody else author had a go at after done that, maybe not much left! Types of property, mansion blocks, grand houses Education is there no public authority education in the area? Focus, most of these in South Ken Residents citations for these - focus, again confusion with South Ken Whole article General focus of article. Concentrate on Knightsbridge, tends to drift into consideration of South Kensington Expand: Substantive content NPOV: Property, people, general tone

The factors apparently used to rank Knightsbridge as a top importance article seem bizarre. The London Plan merely identifies the shopping frontages of Knightsbridge and Brompton Road as being at the top of London's retail hierarchy along with the major shoppings streets of the West End.

The various Albertopolis cultural institutions mentioned are geographically in South Kensington not Knightsbridge, which surely has a much better claim to top importance status.--Lang rabbie 20:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Under "Property" there over 20 "citation needed" tags, eventhough it is under a page in length. i dont know if this is spam or genuine, but it would be great if someone would add links or remove some tags, they seem to ruin this section, thanks JJB 22:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately, it reads like an estate agent on a slow day. Much of it needs a severe Knightsbridge Bob. It would be better to replace most of the 'cites reqd' with a general 'unencyclopaedic', or start again. Kbthompson 22:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)