Talk:Knights and Merchants: The Shattered Kingdom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
Contents |
[edit] Review?
This page reads like a review. -- RHLinuxGUY Sep 18, 3:48 AM Pacific
[edit] Deletion of technology section?
Why did the technology section get deleted? Was it vandalism or was there actually a reason behind it?
[edit] Developer company name
I noticed that someone changed the developer from Joymania Entertainment into Joymania. Currently the official name of the company is Joymania Development, but at the time the game was developed the comapny was called Joymania Entertainment. I don't think calling the developer Joymania is the right choice. I don't know whether the developer should be listed as Joymania Entertainment or Joymania Development, but I think that having the more recent name of the company would probably be a better choice. I've looked at some other articles and they have the company name originally used and then in pharenthesis written "since changed to". By looking at those the correct entry would most likely be "Joymania Entertainment (since changed to Joymania Development)". Any ideas? --Real Hotdog 20:06, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ...
The whole text seems to be written by some German slightly capable of higher English. Gosh!
[edit] settlers!
Why is settlers not mentioned once in the article? The game is clearly a derivative —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.63.99 (talk) 22:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:KaMBattle.jpg
Image:KaMBattle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Kamcover.jpg
Image:Kamcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bias much?
However the AI is not very intelligent so it shouldn't be any big problem to defeat them.
The battle-aspect of this game is not designed really well, the units are controlled rather awkwardly.
Gee, why don't you tell us what you really think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.45.205 (talk) 11:39, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
