User talk:Kneale

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!!
Welcome!!

Hello, Kneale, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please leave me a message.--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 04:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your welcome, I am just about getting the hang of it all!! Kneale 04:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Dante Arthurs

Your recent edit to Dante Arthurs (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:01, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please don't delete messages

Please don't clear messages off your talk page. It is important, especially if you receive warnings such as the message above. That way, users would be able to know how the community has communicated with you.--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 04:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] G Bar

I'll go ask the admin who deleted the page to give you a further explanation on what happened. To make it short, the article in question was in violation of WP:CSD#A7. This policy allows an admin to delete the page on the spot. What was the article about?--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 00:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

The deleting admin, Eagle 101, restored the page on User:Eagle 101/G Bar. Basically, the article does not assert notability. Notability means that the topic of an article must have been the subject of published works (see Wikipedia:Notability for more information). That is why this article was deleted, along with the criterion of WP:CSD#A7.--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 02:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I'll have to scrutinize those pages a little further. All of those articles don't assert notability with verifiable sources (please read WP:V for more info), so they might be able to be deleted.--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 02:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
All articles on Wikipedia are required to comply with all policies and all guidelines. Any article in violation of a policy or a guideline can be deleted.--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 02:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Prescot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Prescot.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BAFTA

The British Academy of Film and Television Arts wiki-article and official website show "BAFTA". The BBC writer was probably being lazy. --Kitch (Talk : Contrib) 13:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Well, the BAFTA website says "BAFTA", so I'm using that. BBC can say Bafta if they want. BAFTA says BAFTA, and that's what should be used. --Kitch (Talk : Contrib) 02:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You are rude!

You need not consider my article on Paul MacLeod for deletion...it is perfectly reasonable seeing as he is referenced on the skydiggers page. As well, I take offense at you calling a good freind of mine "a nob". Whatever you think of my article on Paul, that is just unconstructive critisism!

[edit] Doctor Pk

I still think that the reason for speedly deletion is a7 and not g1. Retagging as a7. by Snowolf (talk) on 13:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Earlier you reported an IP vandal in this [1] edit. In future, please create a new entry, rather than simply replacing the text of previous entries, as you are preventing some vandals from being reviewed by administrators. Thanks, JCO312 20:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Wavertree
Merritt Butrick
Pauly Shore Is Dead
Franz Beckenbauer
Beaches of Singapore
Life support system
John Anderson (actor)
William Kennedy (author)
Kithara
Kevin Millar
Wladek Kowalski
Social rank
Chris Raaber
The Last Temptation of Homer
Tim Vincent
RAC plc
Cyrano Jones
Mike Kruel
Playboy
Cleanup
Phthalocyanine
Muhammad's marriages
Tunja
Merge
Establishment Clause of the First Amendment
Palliative care
Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen
Add Sources
Edge Hill, Liverpool
Doink the Clown
Nexus (Star Trek)
Wikify
Tambaram
Tom Prichard
Postmodern architecture
Expand
Time-variant system
Steve Keirn
Jean-Pierre Papin

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Kneale! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 18:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Open office XML

With regard your use of VP please see section comment under discussion; feel free to preform the reversions with a little more care. Regards Charles Esson 08:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC).

  • I put them back with care giving reason in discussion page, it's only later that I realized that it was someone with a new toy. Regards Charles Esson 10:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NPWatcher

You've been approved to use NPWatcher. Please give Martinp23 any feature requests or bugs. He'll also happy to help if you have any problems running the program, or any questions :). Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if he's made a new release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Finally, enjoy! -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 04:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Wales

How can I do this article without it beening deleted?

--TheGeniusTom 18:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Little Jimmy Urine

Hi! That's a good question. In my opinion, yes, Jimmy Urine is not notable according to Wikipedia standards. Not only is he not notable according to WP:BIO, but he also violates WP:MUSIC and many other policies. Both guidelines have similar criteria, so I'll just show you how Little Jimmy Urine violates many of Wikipedia policies.

After a brief google search on "Little Jimmy Urine", you can see that the web pages already violate WP:RS, since some of those pages are interviews and reviews, sources that are biased in favor of Little Jimmy Urine, thus violating WP:NPOV. Also, a quote from WP:MUSIC states:

  • "This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, and television documentaries except for the following: Media reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician/ensemble talks about themselves, and advertising for the musician/ensemble."

Clearly, the Little Jimmy Urine article cannot be supported by such web sites, since the interviews involve Jimmy Urine talking about himself, giving us biased information for the article in question.

The guideline on notability requires that:

  • "The person has been a primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person."

I did a broader google search on "Jimmy Urine". Do you see how only 3 web pages on "Jimmy Urine" appear? Afterwards, a search on "Mindless Self Indulgence" continues. This tells me that Jimmy Urine is only notable because of his role in Mindless Self Indulgence. If he has any notability outside of MSI, then that might warrant an article. In addition, I did a search on my school's Proquest Platinum database, and there was only 1 periodical that mentioned Jimmy Urine's name, and in passing. That's the trouble with this Wikipedia article. Sources on this guy only mention him in passing. The main subject is MSI.

Look at this version (current during the time I post this message), and you will see that the article is not backed up by sources. It could potentially be filled with WP:OR. The article does not WP:CITE any reliabe sources (RS) (or any sources for that matter).

What other policies have I forgotten??? Oh, yeah! WP:LIVING and WP:V

I'd hate to hit you with all of these policy-related information. I don't know how well accustomed you are into Wikipedia, since you are still a newbie editor (in a way, no offense!). An AfD nomination must be very strong in order to succeed. I wish you good luck on the AfD nomination you submit, and please send me a link to that discussion so I can give more input if needed. If you need any more advice, you can always stop by my talk page! Cheers!--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 01:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

(gasp!) I also found another policy you can use to get that article deleted: WP:N. As you can see, Wikipedia has many policies to keep track of. If only we can merge all of the policies into one page..--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 01:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Are you okay?

You haven't replied to my message above, and it seems like you haven't been contributing that much these days. Are you okay?--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 01:38, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Thomas Wales page

It was about the achievements of Thomas Wales. A young boy that made a business out of nothing.

Infomation and lots more.

[edit] Thomas Wales

Thomas Wales page

It was about the achievements of Thomas Wales. A young boy that made a business out of nothing.

Infomation and lots more.

[edit] re:hello

phew! I knew something was wrong when you suddenly left in between the process of deletion! Well, it's nice to know that you're back. Regarding the AfD on Little Jimmy Urine, I also think that the debate isn't getting any consensus. --Ed ¿Cómo estás? 22:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Help

I am trying to get references to appear on Prescot School - can you help me please? Kneale 02:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The problem is that you have to enclose references with the ref tag, e.g., <ref>[http://... Blah] Accessed on...</ref>. Xiner (talk, email) 02:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Liverpool twin towns

Thanks for your replies here and here. The source you provide is certainly appropriate (and should be reliable). But one thing: what you should never, ever, ever do in a million years is just copy and paste material from the source. You should at least paraphrase it! Obviously, you can't change the lists, but for sentences such as "These links have no formal constitution [...]" you should say something else.

I'll fix it (and add the in-line citation) when I have time. --RFBailey 22:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Michel Perrenoud

Hi, istappears the English language tags you put on this article have been deleted - just thought I'd let you know. Also, a previous version of this page was deleted a couple of days ago per CSD G11 (spam). My French isn't particularly good these days, but the content looks like spam again. Worth recommending for speedy deletion? Cheers Saganaki- 11:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)