User talk:Kmorozov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives:
[edit] Hello, Why Did You Create {{TOCrightEx}}?
How is this template different from {{TOCright}}?100110100 08:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- My template has an additional parameter for font size Kmorozov 11:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mario, Duke of Bavaria
This looks like some kind of joke. Kingjeff 15:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] pedigrees
You may wish to check the several genealogical trees mentioned at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek pedigree of Empress Sisi. Maed 02:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rulers of Württemberg
You might be interested to know that I am currently expanding the articles of the rulers of Württemberg. So if you interwiki them correctly, the will appear blue. See: Eberhard II--Tresckow 03:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hi.
I have message for you (in russian wiki). I prefer contacts in Russia because my English. --MaratL 07:00, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Genealogy of the Spanish Royal Family
Thank-you for contributing to my creation: Genealogy of the British Royal Family! However, I have a new creation about a Spanish incarnation that I think you'd be interested in seeing and maybe contributing to. -I'm Working for Him 03:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Ohmgosh! I'm SOOO sorry! I did not know that it was private. Please accept my very deepest apologies to you and I feel SOOO bad about that! I feel just awful. My actions were done at like what? 11:30 or something? I'm notorious for offending people pretty late at night. I just thought the one I moved was more detailed than the public one. Once again I feel horrible! -- I'm Working for Him 04:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Well, excuse me! I believe it's rather dumb to delete "a happy moment" JUST BECAUSE I simply made a mistake and changed the name! You can always change it back ya rock! -I'm Working for Him 22:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ministers of Transport
Hi there, KMorozov! You see, the thing is that it used to be Министерство Путей Сообщения and not Министерство Транспорта и Связи. Historically speaking, you shouldn't have renamed it, if you know what I mean. What you could do is write an intro explaining how МПС was turned into Минтранс in 2004 (was it 2004?). Lemme know what you think. Cheers! KNewman 15:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi! The Railway Ministry and Transport Ministry used to be two different ministries of Russia. In 2004 Railway Ministry was abolished and transformed into the Russian Railways public JS company rather than merged with the Transport Ministry, so I urge you to review your edits related to this issue. The redirect you have established is very confusing. Colchicum 21:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- 9 марта 2004 года Президент РФ В.Путин подписал Указ «О системе и структуре федеральных органов исполнительной власти», согласно которому МПС России было упразднено. Функции по принятию нормативных правовых актов в установленной сфере деятельности переданы Министерству транспорта и связи. Правоприменительные функции, функции по оказанию государственных услуг и по управлению имуществом в сфере железнодорожного транспорта упраздняемого Министерства путей сообщения Российской Федерации переданы Федеральному агентству железнодорожного транспорта. [1] So technically speaking they have been merged, but I don't think it is reasonable to refer to the Railway Ministry as Transport Ministry, because they have been distinct for most of their history, including very recent history (Kasyanov's cabinet, Putin's cabinet, Stepashin's cabinet, Primakov's cabinet, Kiriyenko's cabinet, Chernomyrdin's cabinets), the Railway Ministry looked more important (in 1999 everybody heard of the late Nikolay Aksyonenko), and now most of its functions are transferred to Russian Railways. Colchicum 23:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Banking in Russia (regulations), was selected for DYK!
 |
On February 26, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Banking in Russia (regulations), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 18:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
|
On 13 March 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eastern journey of Nicholas II, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--Carabinieri 13:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
|
On 18 March 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alexander von Stieglitz, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--ALoan (Talk) 10:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Michail J. Makarenko
Michail J. Makarenko did not transliterate his own name in the standard way, so properly the article should be named “Michail J. Makarenko”, with Mikhail Makarenko and Mikhail J. Makarenko being redirects. —SlamDiego 09:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Category:Russian Biographical Dictionary" proposed for deletion
A CfD has been called against Category:Russian Biographical Dictionary and most other "categories by source". (The categories are proposed for deletion, not the articles within them). If this category is useful to you, and you would prefer it not to be deleted, please comment at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_24#"By-source_categories". Jheald Jheald 15:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] About up and down
I don't mean to do any parade-raining, but would you at all mind moving {{up}} and {{down}} into your user space? It's not like every unused template has to be deleted, but... I think that it might be better to keep it in userspace, if no one intends on implementing it. But I'm not sure about this, and thus am asking you, the creator, about it. GracenotesT § 03:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know, how it (moving to my user space) can be implemented. Historically, months ago, the only article using these templates was in main space. Kmorozov 04:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] TOCrightEx
Notification of template deletion discussion on the template {{TOCrightEx}} at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:TOCrightEx. —Dispenser 02:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Anastasiya_Vertinskaya.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Anastasiya_Vertinskaya.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 13:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Persis_khambatta.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Persis_khambatta.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 23:27, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Urach.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Urach.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:The_Queen_of_Spades_(1982_film).jpg
I have tagged Image:The_Queen_of_Spades_(1982_film).jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 22:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Sobaka_Baskervilej.jpg
I have tagged Image:Sobaka_Baskervilej.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 22:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Peggy lee black coffee.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Peggy lee black coffee.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Banking technology solutions
Shouldn't this just be Category:Banking technology? LMK if you object to it being renamed. --Lukobe (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Banking technology solutions
Category:Banking technology solutions, which you edited, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Lukobe (talk) 06:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:1947 zolushka.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1947 zolushka.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Boris Efimov caricature 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Boris Efimov caricature 1.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Boris Efimov caricature 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Boris Efimov caricature 2.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
