Talk:Klaipėda Revolt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Klaipėda Revolt is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lithuania on Wikipedia. To participate simply edit the article or see our to-do list. On the project page we have some tools to help you out. Don't hesitate to ask questions!
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Comments Please leave a short summary to explain the ratings and to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

See also Memelland or Territoire de Memel as in the Treaty of Versailles. --Matthead 20:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Please feel free to improve the article, or be a little more detailed than that. Thanks, heqs 15:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
What a great lie is this article. There was nothing like revolt. Simply lithunian aarmy was redressed as civilians. Now even lithunian historians admits it was occupation of Klaipėda/Memel territory. It's ridiculous use as references books, that were published in Soviet Lithuania in 1945-1990, historian R. Žiugžda - was famous for stalinistic style dogmas.--Tarakonas 14:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merger

This content belongs into the Memelland article, it a major part of the history there. It is suffering from too much Lithuanian POV, but this will be straigthened out by facts.--Matthead 02:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Oppose merger. The revolt is a significant event on it's own. Renata 03:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose merger M.K. 18:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose merger. Don't see the alleged "too much Lithuanian POV". Please explain. --Lysytalk 23:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose completely heqs 18:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Myth

There was no rebellion at all. See [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vulpes vulpes (talkcontribs)

Well, there was a revolt, but it was mainly carried out by forces from outside, rather than from within the Memel territory. -- Matthead discuß!     O       20:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
If regular army from outside is redressed as rebellions and if rebellion is carried out by forces from outside, this don't makes a "rebellion" real rebellion. --Vulpes vulpes 10:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] biased articles

This is definitelly one of the most biased articles I have read in Wikipedia. I am really shocked.

And this one is the best: On January 19, the directory of Klaipėda region asked for admission into Lithuania as an autonomous territory (where the Klaipėda region would have a separate parliament and government, two official languages, be the administrator of taxes, duties, cultural and religious affairs, would oversee the local judicial system, agriculture and forestry, and social security). Lithuania accepted this, and thus the Klaipėda Region became an autonomous part of Lithuania. When I have read this? I remember, an Soviet encyclopedy about "admission" of Lithuania into Soviet Union in 1940.

This article definitelly is a shame... 79.64.179.71 21:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)