User talk:Kl4m
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Test sig -- Kl4m Talk Contrib 20:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Image Tag
Thanks Kl4m. I couldn't figured out how to do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Occamsrzr (talk • contribs) 01:11, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] LA Galaxy
I deleted the Getty photo and replaced it with another and listed the source. So why are you being anal and blocking it?! englandfan7
[edit] freedom
Well,I said it,you choose or you lose...and you chose.Maybe I'm not sure how this works yet
[edit] .
Hey, so can you please delete it for me? I don't know how to delete it, nor how to talk to you. I'm a newbie here. Thanks
[edit] Helen Lovejoy
In some episodes, Helen appears with Maude and talk much like Lionel Hutz or Gil Gunderson y they episodes. Helen Lovejoy needs her own article.
--Voltex115, 23:20 8 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] CONSENSUS
The CONSENSUS is incorrect, my edits are official which are from the official japanese and american websites http://www.pokemon.com/#tvmovies and from http://www.pokemon.co.jp/. I am trying to make them be official. The episodes from 1-276 are not right none of those episodes contain kanji they are all and ONLY in Hiragana and katakana —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metroidnerd (talk • contribs)
- There are no officials here my friend, welcome to wikipedia, which works by consensus. SpigotMap 00:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
blah blah removed -- Kl4m T C 00:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Max Mosley
K14m, on 23 September, you removed several of my edits about Max Mosley's actively fascist past and, following my protest, you put them into a special review area. These serious, well-researched, well-sourced and significant edits have now been left in a state of limbo for nearly six weeks. I have been quite patient, I think, in refraining from commenting upon the lack of activity until now, and feel it is now legitimate to ask if the removal of my edits were a genuine effort to "review" or just an attempt to censor. I will not roll over and die, if that is the hope. I reiterate that every one of my edits was well-sourced with citations. Given that fact, they were hardly difficult to "research" - I had done most of the work for you already. Please tell me when we may expect some movement on this matter, or is it Wikipedia's intention to obstruct important details about the historical activities of one of today's leading sports administrators? Duncan Berger Talk 12:26, 29 October 2007
[edit] Arch Enemy Bootlegs
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Arch Enemy Bootlegs, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}}
to the top of Arch Enemy Bootlegs. Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Free_Software_Portal_Logo.svg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Free_Software_Portal_Logo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Nard 20:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)