User talk:Kjhughes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello Kjhughes! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Signature icon.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Tyrenius 01:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

[edit] Guide to referencing

Click on "show" to open contents.

[edit] Richard I

Hi can you provide sources and/or explanation for these changes? Thanks Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 01:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Citations would be excellent. Specifically, Kjhughes, you mentioned Henry the Young King succeeding his father as Henry III in 1174. I'm presuming you mean Henry III of England, however the link Henry III takes you to a disambiguation page with a number of Henry IIIs. In any case, although I understand Young Henry was crowned as his father's successor, he died before his father and so never reigned as Henry III, therefore that statement should certainly change. Thanks/cheers, Ian Rose 04:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi sorry you need to provide sources for your changes otherwise we can have people changing all sorts of things for a joke. Hope you understand. Regards Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 19:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bishop of Agde

I have actually just created the article bishop of Agde. But please leave red links where they are appropriate. In the long run Wikipedia benefits from having the articles created that are needed. (I'm in the middle of a big project on French bishops right now, and making the links takes longer than the articles, in some cases.) Charles Matthews 20:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Doroshenko

Under WP:BLP, I have removed the external links you placed. They are selected for negative content, and there is nothing in the main text about such events. Please do not replace them. It is likely to result in your being blocked. Tyrenius 23:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Kjhughes replies: this is high-handed and unwarranted - the links are all to verifiable UK newspaper articles that might be of interest to users. The links will be restored, although unlike Tyrenius I have a life so may not get round to it for a bit —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kjhughes (talkcontribs).

You posted this in my talk archive:

I agree, this Tyrenius person does seem a little pompous and up himself - he deleted some links I added to a piece about curator Peter Doroshenko which were all to verifiable UK national newspaper articles. And he clearly doesn't have much detailed knowledge about the visual arts. Comment added by Kjhughes talk

Please don't post in archives. Post on the current user talk page. Also put 4 tildes ~ after talk posts to sign them.

You are posting only external links that have negative content. Wikipedia articles are not to be used as attack pages. If you want to include this information, which seems to be viable, it should be done in the article in a balanced way without undue weight per WP:NPOV. If you merely reinsert such negative links in the way you have to date it will be a contravention of WP:BLP and you will be blocked from editing.

Please also refrain from personal comments per WP:NPA. Comment on edits, not editors.

Tyrenius 00:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC) Please also refrain from

If you look at Google news you will see that the recent UK press reports on this item are all there. Do you think Google news is "negative"? Kjhughes 00:20, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Kjhughes

News is very often negative and sensationalised, and wikipedia is not a newspaper. I advise you to read WP:BLP. There is strong concern on wikipedia that articles, particularly of living people, must be balanced and give an overview, not give undue weight, especially to negative aspects of a person's life at the expense of the whole. The material may well be valid if it is incorporated in proper proportion in the article text and referenced. External links should not be relied on for material that should be in the main text. Tyrenius 00:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)