Talk:Kitty Yung
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to actors and filmmakers on Wikipedia. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Sex work task force. (with unknown importance) | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
I really don't think this image is "appropriate" for Wikipedia - I find it a bit offensive, but others may be greatly offended by it. Normally such material (remember, this is porn, not anatomical or artistic) would be considered too indecent for an encyclopedia and more the matter of Playboy or a so-called "adult video store". Anybody agree? ( User:Jakes18)
- This one I don't feel strongly one way or another about. It is a very low resolution image that not much explicit can be gleened from and seems properly tagged. I don't see that Image:Kittyyung2-sm2.jpg is any more offensive than having an articles pron stars explicitily discussing their careers. -- Infrogmation 06:25, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- If they are offended by it, then why are they looking up porn stars in the first place? (Arundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 12:17, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
I agree there the picture itself is not tasteless in any sense. Also this is an adult topic etc. I mean for crying out loud we have topics about sexual postions and fetishes. I really don't think the picture is over the top at all. --Link25 08:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
There is a (much younger) Kitty Jung credited with several movies beginning in 2003, shortly after she turned 19- how are these two stars related?
Kitty Jung is indeed, a completely different adult film actress than Kitty "Yung". The two are often confused and "Kitty Jung" has actually appeared erroneously as an alias for Kitty Yung - the much more seasoned adult film star.
I also agree with the previous submission. I don't think an adult film star warrants enough attention to be listed on Wikipedia. There are notable exceptions such as "Ron Jeremy" or "Marilyn Chambers", individuals that have earned a place in American pop/media culture. I seriously doubt Kitty Yung has achieved pop culture status, regardless of her obvious fan base. Please understand that I have no "moral" issue with this subject but I do have issue with an entity listed in Wikipedia without enough fame or infamy to be of any value to serious inquiry or research.
