Talk:Kiplyn Davis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Does anyone have any more specific information about the "numerous indictments" mentioned in the article? That would be helpful there. Kaiterra 10:03, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV
I've had to make numberous edits to this article in order to try to keep it NPOV. Please be aware that any information added that violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy will be removed. Reliable sources must also be included to verify any statements being made. Lastly, please note that Original Research will be deleted as well per WP:OR. While I understand that some individuals may have issues with the way the investigation was handled, Wikipedia is not a soapbox to air your views. ponyo (talk) 13:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Curious
I have made several edits to this page, as it does appear to leave a great amount of information out of its contents. However, I am curious about what exactly has been added that would be considered bias rather than NPOV. Can you please tell me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.79.212.220 (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- My main concern is that many assertions in the article do not adhere to a Neutral Point of View. Examples of this include "While many were found to be less than truthful in the investigation...", "Many believe...", "Though no direct evidence has been found, authorities remain certain...", "Many others believe"... All of comments are unsourced and as such can be construed as non-NPOV and/or original research. I have removed the information again as this is an encyclopedia that requires reliable sources and neutrality. I urge anyone who would like to re-insert the material to read the the sections on Wikipedia policy and guidelines that I've outlined in the 'NPOV' section above. ponyo (talk) 15:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)