From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user talk page has been protected from editing to prevent this banned user from editing it. If you have come here to issue a new warning to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

I don't know what to say besides Welcome to my page. Please leave a comment. Thanks. KingWen 21:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello KingWen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! WillMak050389 02:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

I am always glad to help new people and am welcome for any questions you may have. Have a great time here! --WillMak050389 03:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm here

Sorry I got you're message so late, but i am here right now and should be on for the next 2.5-3 hrs if you need something. Always glad to help with any questions you have. --WillMak050389 03:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Quite fine, keep me in mind if you remember them or have any others that arise. --WillMak050389 03:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Re:First question

Sorry that I didn't get your message last night, but I went to bed. Hope you can contact me tonight. --WillMak050389 12:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Sure, you can sign up here and welcome newcomers and help them along. I personally use the "get welcomed template" ( {{subst:welcomeg}} ). For the list of recently created accounts go here. Hope this helps. --WillMak050389 15:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, there are several accounts created each minute, but don't try to welcome everyone, only those that show interest or contribute to Wikipedia. --WillMak050389 15:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say but I think you could probably look at Special:Log/newusers and look for blue links to user pages. --WillMak050389 15:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Most of the people I welcome are people that I've seen on my watchlist that have not been welcomed (look at user talk page history). Mostly these are epople contributing to articles I watch and have not gotten any user talk edits. --WillMak050389 16:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

This account has been blocked as another obvious reincarnation of User:Thewolfstar. (Compare interests and edits to similarly-blocked User:Lingeron as well.) See discussion currently on AN/I for more information. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

response to block and maybe sockpuppet maybe impersonator charges

Lingeron is Christian or speaks about Jesus. I am King Wen, the author of the most widely used I Ching today. I hardly see the comparison, Bunchofgrapes. I , nor The I Ching, are religious. Your interpretations of such bely your ignorance, I'm afraid.

I'm not susrprised at the block. As a matter of fact, having followed the history of anarchism, talk:anarchism, Talk:Anarchism/Archives and it's various contributors for some time now, it is clear that anyone who disagrees with, particularly with AaronS or The Ungovernable Force, and attempts to places information into that article that is not socialistiscally or communistically oriented, particularly if it's related to U.S. anarchists in some way, winds up magically blocked. See User_talk:AaronS#The_Individualist, where they brag about getting two users blocked in two days:

I'm shocked! You mean that was a sock the whole time? No! So hey, that's two blocked in two days, not bad! The Ungovernable Force 05:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Haha, yeah, I think we're starting to get the gist of this. --AaronS 12:33, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, you're getting the gist of it alright..

• Ban any user who attempts interjection of neutrality into controversial Wikipedia articles.
• Ban any user who attempts to round out such articles with fact.
• Ban any user who expresses criticism of Wikipedia.
  

Wikipedia's reputation and credibilty are on a speedy decline. Keep it up, socialists, and you will achieve it, no problem! Then again, maybe this is your aim, Cabalist Admins and vast, loyalist, ever-marching-forward army of communist editors.

Relentless pursuit of non-communist anarchists (an oxymoron if I ever heard one) and their victims:

1. User:Hogeye how surprising -- blocked
2. User:RJII how surprising -- blocked
3. User:Vision Thing accused of sockpuppetry (RJll)
4. User:TheIndividualist how surprising -- blocked after harassement, admitted or not.
5. User:Intangible who has an arbcom going now.
6. User:MrVoluntarist repeatedly harassed -- see User_talk:MrVoluntarist
7. User:Lingeron how surprising -- blocked
8. User:KingWen and now me, the latest perpetrator of fact into Wikipedia articles. (I know it's offensive to seek fact and inclusiveness in an enclyclopedia, so who could blame you.

A good point made by User:Twobitsprite Talk:Anarchism/Archive39#anarchism project: Does anyone have any evidence that this is hogeye>? I'm concerned that this hogeye figure has become a straw man representing anyone who might disagree with the views of certain editors... it seems like it's a bit common practice to just dismiss out of hand any comment from any IP or unrecognized username as being a "Sock-puppet of Hogeye"...? [1].

Apparantly User:Thewolfstar is another wonderful bag in which to throw and ban users who dissent certain well-guarded articles. Another choice is RJII. How convenient, comrades!

More devilry and malicious activity on the part of The Ungovernable Force and AaronS can be seen here and this is extremely interesting: Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/Anarcho-capitalism, where they wear a featured article down with massive (illegal) reverts, and then try to get it's featured status removed. The ugliness of Blah's and Aaron's actions and clear intent of ridding non-communist-anarchist articles on Wikipedia is glaringly obvious. But, naturally, this nasty and unencyclopedic activity is ignored, 'nother big surprise.

Finally, this is hilarious Wikipedia:Suggestions on how to ignore all rules. KingWen_€ŸØãç 19:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Hm, that was an argument Lingeron made a lot. Oh, and she also had a tendency of screwing up headings like you just did (Making them too big and such). The Ungovernable Force 20:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

to the Governable Farce

Maybe Lingeron made those arguments against you and AaronS for the same reason that everyone else I mentioned above did. And you have a history of screwing up Wikipedia with pov pushing. Like has been said before, there is no such thing as communist anarchism. Socialist Libertarianism is another gem. May as well Nazi Freedomism. You might read 'Our Enemy the State' by Albert Jay Nock. Another thing you do which is quite despicable, is pretend to be friendly with people while helping to get them blocked. I don't know what it is...it's just one of those things in the real world that people tend to disfavor. You know, phoniness, hypocracy, brown nosing, pretending to be an anarchist. Little things like that. Like you've been told before, Gov, anarchists don't cohort and plot with government officials against people. Just a few objectionable and unanarchistic tenedencies you have. KingWen_€ŸØãç 22:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and did I mention the way you patronize others in the most obnoxious and insulting way? KingWen_€ŸØãç 22:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Or maybe because most of the people you mentioned were the same person (or same few people). Hogeye engaged in frequent personal attacks and disruptive editing and has a very long list of sockpuppets who have been blocked by various administrators for being abusive and evading blocks. RJII admitted on their userpage that they were here in an attempt to push a capitalist-libertarian POV and that they purposefully broke numereous policies to do so and did everything they could to psychologically torment the other editors they were working with (or more accurately, against), including myself. The Individualist and AnarchistIndividualist admitted to being sockpuppets of the banned RJII. Intangible's arbcom was filed by someone outside of the anarchism debate due to their abrasive and pov editing on other pages--the only common factor is Intangible. As far as I know I have not harassed MrVoluntarist (I'm not on their talk page). Although I don't agree with their beliefs I don't go out of my way to cause problems with them, since they don't appear to do anything to warrant my attention. I have good faith that they are here to improve this encyclopedia and not to crusade against us evil "commies" like Hogeye, RJII, and you Thewolfstar/Lingeron. You Lingeron was blocked for exausting the entire communities patience. In fact, I purposefully avoiding going to the admins with you her because I didn't feel like going and proving your her theory that I would just go run to the admins and rat you her out for your her copious personal attacks (and you she made some of the worst ones I've seen on this website to date). Besides that, you she was proven to be a sockpuppet of Thewolfstar, who was also banned for exausting the communities patience (and as you well know, I had nothing to do with that since I avoided you her after I started to see how much trouble she was causing on this site). If you truly look up to people like Hogeye, RJII and Lingeron/Thewolfstar/Yourself and feel like you are carrying on their work, then it's no surprise you've been blocked. And the only reason I "cohort and plot with government officials" is because, unlike in the real world, I have no power to take direct action on this website (unless I train up on hacking, but I'm not too good with computers so I don't see that happening). Otherwise I would have stopped this crap myself. And I was serious when I was being nice with you Lingeron, but as I said, it was dependent on you their acting in a reasonable manner, which you they didn't. They kept up their abusive editing so at the last minute (when they were already assured of a block anyways) I added my two cents to the discussion. And why are you singling me out? I didn't have anything to do with your block (the only comments I have made about it have been after the fact). You seem to hold some serious animosity towards me for something (perhaps something that happened to you in a past life?). BTW, The Ungovernable Farce is also a good song. I'm glad to see you like Conflict too. The Ungovernable Force 10:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Uh, are you paranoid? I didn't single you out. I pointed to where you and AaronS were gloating together over the ban of 2 users in 1 day. A quick look at talk:anarchism and it's archives will confirm everything I already stated above. Next you came here on my page with the obvious intention of aggravating me some more, and I responded to it. I don't like the band Conflict. My taste is more austere. I called you Ungovernable Farce for the same reason that User:Lingeron did. The Ungovernable Force kind of drums up thoughts of a person with an independent mind that can't be bent by propaganda or told what to do by authority. I, Like Lingeron, feel that The Governable Farce is a much more apt name. You are clearly a good little boy now. You are obedient to the admins, and your aim is so in tune with Wikipedia. As it's evident that people, particularly Americans and Brits, who seek a democratic respublic, are not welcome here, you do the job of Socialist soldier very well. Keep up the good work. Oh, and while we're on communism/socialism lets check out nihilism and Nineteen Eighty-four as they are so appropos to these ideologies. One more thing -- take a closer look at talk:anarchism and this archive to see a group of bullies who attack and ridicule Lingeron constantly -- before she attacks them back. Please, Gov, go get a good version of the I Ching and learn honesty, while seeking spiritual help for your nihilist, untruthful, and downright phony self. KingWen_€ŸØãç 20:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

You do realize that George Orwell, the guy who wrote 1984 was a socialist, right? It amazes me to see how many people try to use that book as anti-socialist propaganda, when in fact it was only criticizing certain types of socialism (namely, the same kinds I don't like and for the same reasons Orwell illustrates). And I think you've done more than a quick look--you seem to know quite a lot about what happened in the past and seem to have done quite a lot of digging (more than any reasonable person would likely spend their time on). Oh, and maybe the reason you and Lingeron both said the same thing is because you're the same person. Anyways, that's the last I have to say to you (until you get another sock of course), so until that time, good bye. I don't know who you think you're fooling. Ungovernable Force^{The Wiki Kitchen!} 20:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Funny. I'm not trying to fool anyone. It's you, Gov, who pretends. And I've heard it said that George Orwell was a socialist but I'm not buying it. Sounds like something one of your socialismologists would say. Or maybe it's a thing that a socialist worker would say. Ya' know what's really funny? The way you slam Thewolfstar -- that was her anim_hitler_bush_skull_and_bones animation you were toting on your page. KingWen_€ŸØãç 20:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

So, Bunchofgrapes

Can I see honorable admins evidence that I am a repitition of a blocked user? It would be very informative if all these administators, besides you and the highly esteemed AaronS, who have blocked me according to sign on my page, and arbitration committee, and or Jimbo Wales, would appear and give testimony confirming my sameness with puppeteer Thewolfstar. Because AaronS, as I have strong fact above, is not the most reliable of witnesses and surely shows himself to be underhanded and an article destroyer. Anarcho-capitalism and the heavily biased Anarchism is prime example. Can we have something of proof that I am ghost of Thewolfstar? Humblest of Thanks for Adminisrators Honesty. KingWen_€ŸØãç 06:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)