Talk:Kings County Savings Bank
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page has quite a few repetitions, especially "by the wealth for the wealth." It can be pared down. Hypeer 20:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
We have discussion of the bank and of its building. Shouldn't these be seperate? Alba 22:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think so, especially if the building is still known as the old bank building. Unless there's a lot more content for either just the bank or just the building, might as well leave them in one article. --Kerowyn 09:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that the article is fine the way it is. There's no evidence in the article that the (no longer functioning) bank is independent-article-worthy, while the building, as a landmark, most probably is. It would probably make sense, though, to make the timeline more building-specific, instead of merely bank name changes. I removed the split tag. Cpastern 09:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)