Talk:King Sejong the Great class destroyer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces (general topics):
	Maritime warfare task force
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	Korean military history task force

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start	rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale
High	rated as High-importance on the assessment scale

[edit] "Super Burke"

The words of "Super Burke" is not a generalized word. For example, when we search this word at Google and Yahoo, we can not find it. And Korean major newspapers don't use this word, too. They said "the King Sejong-class destroyers are reportedly the second most powerful after the American version. Digital Chosun —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.217.70.191 (talk • contribs) 04:41, January 2, 2008

They are, however, clearly an enlarged version of the Arleigh Burke Flight IIA design. 71.203.209.0 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 06:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)