Talk:King Rat (1962 novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class. | ||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
Japan To-do:
|
|
 |
 An attempt to better coordinate and organise articles related to Singapore. To participate, simply edit this page or visit our noticeboard for more info. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
I'm still reading the James Clavell book, "King Rat". I found one of the first edition (1962) hard cover books in a yard sale nearby my home. The book, in excellent condition, still has its paper cover. I'd kicked it around my bookcases during at least two moves. Finally, one evening, desparate for some mindless reading entertainment, I found the Clavell novel again. I picked it up and immediately noted a reccomendation by the late Ian Flemming (of the James Bond novels fame). I had also noted the 1962 year copyright; and that the book would soon be made into a motion picture. Well, I was about ten or eleven at that time the movie would have been released, and I would not have seen the movie at the theatre in, I believe, 1965 (movie release date). However, I could only believe that I must have seen the movie some time in my later life (it is currently 2006). I just couldn't recall anything about the movie. After reading about 88 or 95 pages, I began trying to recall the movie again. But, nothing came up. Was I going senile? Of course! But, I realized that this novel was fantastic after only about 1/3 read. The next day I was discussing it with a co-worker. I'm in my fifties, my friend is in his seventies. He said he'd seen the movie, but that he couldn't exactly recall the actors who would have been in the movie version. I'd mentioned the "King" probably being played by someone like a young Steve McQueen. My friend had said, "No...it was the actor-tough-guy ... someone like James Cagney..." Well, we were both wrong: it was Eric Seegal. Not to mention dozens of other stars and co-stars all well cast for their respective roles. Well, back to the book. I will not blow the ending here, but I will speak of generalities lauding the book for you readers of POW stories. Yes, it takes place in a Japanese POW camp during WWII, in a Changi prison facility. The POWs are from various allied nations: Americans, Aussies, English, Scottish, Welsh...yes, and Texas, too! This particular prisoner of war camp is, of course, controlled by Japanese military. This takes place during the latter WWII years. Author James Clavell was, in fact, an actual survivor of this camp, that had, apparently, held as many as 150,000 allied prisoners...which later dwindled to a mere 10,000 survivors by war's end. Each character is so excellently fleshed out by the author's pen...he could have written a book on each character! The "King" is this American non-com who initially seems to be a typical common-opportunist, who takes advantage of the other prisoners by scamming and conning them out of their meager assets...from food to family heirlooms. But, the King has only acted like everyone else has...from the basis of need to survive Jap camp atrocities. Oh, the Jap guards mostly let the men manage their own internal affairs...as long as they obey the "camp rules" and don't escape. In fact, the real reason the pow's rations are reduced...is because the Japs themselves are having an increasing difficulty obtaining food and supplies for their own survival. You see not only the King's character dynamically metamorphosing from one personality trait to another...as hardships and degrading camp morale and disease/slow starvation take their toll on the men's mental and physical health...but also for virtually every other character. Well...got to go read some more of the book. I'm no professional book reviewer/critic...but it's a hell of a read for you WWII buffs. And, the fact that Clavell, himself, was actually inside the changi prison camp as a prisoner...lends itself to the authentic sensory literary reproduction of those unhappy and tragic years for so many brave men. Mr. Clavell died in 1994...Well, Sir: I'm your new fan. I also note that Mr. Clavell was a writer of a lot of the early American TV series, including the 1959-1960 "Men in Space" series, of which I was an ardent fan at around the age of 8 or 9. He also wrote for "The Rifleman" TV series. I only saw the show, "Shogun", a TV mini-series in the 1980s, and I think I'd like to actually read that Clavell novel next. Well: get the book and read "King Rat". I am!!! --70.226.143.172 03:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- King Rat is a superb novel. I've recommended it again and again, and even people who aren't big readers can't put it down and come back to me extremely satisfied, and wanting more. Clavell has written some of the finest historical fiction ever, in my personal opinion. JubalHarshaw 18:07, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Contradiction (Accuracy of figures)
I'm having a few doubts about this statement:
-
- Clavell was one of 10,000 survivors of the 150,000 prisoners held there [i.e., at Changi Prison]
In the Changi Prison article, it says
-
- 850 POWs died during their internment in Changi during the Japanese occupation [2], a comparatively low rate compared to the overall death rate of 27% for POWs in Japanese camps.
So how many POWs died at Changi? Was it 140,000 or 850? -- Sakurambo 桜ん坊 16:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- There was a good reason for the ex-POWs not to commemorate such horrors: atrocities did not occur at Changi. Out of the 87,000 POWs who passed through the camp, only 850 died. Many of the fatalities at Changi were the result of battle wounds the men had suffered before being taken prisoner in 1942, not because of conditions at the prison. Compared with other POW camps, Changi did not have a high death toll. The article in turn references the Straits Times in 1945 after the liberation of Singapore, hardly a source likely to be overly sympathetic to the Japanese. Jpatokal 06:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
-
Umm, who took out my addition that the possibility that the character of the King was based on Theodore Lewin? The only explanation given in the "history" is that James Clavell himself denied this. Citations? Proof? Huh?
24.200.93.124 18:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)nick@montrealfood.com
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:JamesClavell KingRat.jpg
Image:JamesClavell KingRat.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
