Talk:King K. Rool

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article is on a subject of mid priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.

Wikitendo logo This article is part of WikiProject Nintendo, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Nintendo related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.


Contents

[edit] Umm

You have to be crazy to think Diddy deserves an article more the K. Rool. Main villian! If we take off him we should take off bowser to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kperfekt722 (talkcontribs) 22:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Not multiple personalities?

According to the trophy in SSBB of King K. Rool, Kaptain K. Rool is his brother. Thus, we can conclude that they are separate characters. The article needs to be revised to reflect this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.135.122 (talk) 23:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it needs to be heavily fixed. I also take it that Baron K. Roolenstein is another character as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WeeklyJumpman (talkcontribs) 22:16, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to see someone translate quotes from official Japanese sources saying that King K. Rool, Kaptain K. Rool, and Baron K. Roolenstein are all brothers/cousins/related and not the same character. I find it skeptical that it's repeated often without actual proof to back it up. But it would explain why he kept getting shorter. 67.214.25.100 (talk) 20:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

No no no no no. Kaptain K.Rool was only portrayed as K.Rool's brother in the Japanese versions of the Donkey Kong Country games (same with Baron K.Roolenstein). The trophy in Brawl was only a misunderstood translation of the Japanese trophy. Rare always intended Kaptain K.Rool and the Baron to be alternate personalities, never brothers of K.Rool. --124.169.141.71 (talk) 09:45, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

But Rare's gone now. Nintendo owns the characters. So Nintendo's say is final. 208.101.144.247 (talk) 23:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] KING KAPTAIN

GET A PICTURE OF K ROOL AS A SCIENTIST

[edit] Crocodiles wanting bananas?

K. Rool is pretty much nuts anyway. Just recall his dialogue in DKC3, where he claims to be upset because his wife's best pots and pans were used to make KAOS, and then he says that KAOS was his ticket to world domination. I don't think it should be surprising his original motive was taking the banana horde. --Juigi Kario (Charge! * My crusades) 03:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] King K. Rool confirmed to not appear in playable status but rather as Sub Space Emissary boss along side windwaker ganon

75.15.219.214 (talk) 06:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeahh... no. Those were trophies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.58.16.108 (talk) 03:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:King K. Rool.jpg

Image:King K. Rool.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)