Talk:King Edward VI College, Nuneaton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Schools This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-Importance within Schools.

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.

Start This page has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
??? This page has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Some Changes Need to be Made...

I couldn't help but notice a few untruths in this article. Should I go ahead and edit them out? --Oliverlane89 (talk) 12:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes you are at liberty to correct the article, but please remember to cite your sources and leave an appropriate Edit summary for the changes you make. Keith D (talk) 13:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

This may prove somewhat difficult as I know the errors from firsthand experience, I am an old Boy of the School. Please Advise. --Oliverlane89 (talk) 00:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

It is difficult to advise without knowing the extent of the changes that are to be made. If the changes are minor and non-controversial I would correct each error and state clearly what you are doing in the Edit summary. If the changes are more extensive and cannot be sourced then I would suggest discussing them on the talk page first to get input/agreement from others who have knowledge of the school.
Having looked more closely at the article I do not believe that all of the information is derived from the single reference source so looks like it needs attention on the sources front.
Keith D (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)