User talk:Killerhun00

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Killerhun00, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Francs2000 14:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Talk:Aristasia

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Removing the comments of others from talk pages is a form of vandalism. Mangojuicetalk 12:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The above is what we call a vandalism warning. I can see how it's confusing, because you clearly weren't "testing" wikipedia, you made the edit intentionally. I didn't think you didn't make the edit intentionally, but the first-level warning is friendly and doesn't assume you were trying to harm things. Let me be a bit more informative. If you look at Wikipedia:Vandalism, under "types of vandalism" you will see that "Deleting the comments of other users from article talk pages" is a type of vandalism. If you disagree with someone's comment, you can comment on it, as long as you keep it civil and don't make personal attacks. But removing it from the talk page is like you're trying to make people think that someone never said it, which is very different. Anyway, I'm sure you didn't know about this issue: Wikipedia's rules are complicated, and now you do. Mangojuicetalk 19:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
I thought I had added it back, but I guess I made a mistake. Anyway, if you think Aristasia is notable, you should explain so and why on the AfD page; that is, the current debate. Regardless, Aristasia can't be removed from AfD until the AfD is complete, which takes about 7 days. Mangojuicetalk 12:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tara Reid image

Hi, Killerhun00. I removed the image Image:Tara-reid-717164.jpg from the Tara Reid article because, according to Wikipedia's fair use policy, Magazine covers should only be used to illustrate an article or section about the magazine issue in question. That is, we can't use them to illustrate an article about the person depicted on the cover. You may want to read the counter-exmaple #7 on the image's Fair Use guidelines.

Also, we should really avoid uploading images we do not know the source. And avoid tagging some image as {{promotional}} unless we are pretty sure this image was really released with a promotional purpose (this includes knowing the original source of the image, and the statement from the copyright holder explaining the image is intended for distribution).

The second Tara Reid you have upload, Image:Tara-reid-011.jpg , has as source the website http://www.hissandpop.com/ . This seems to be a general celebrity photo-gathering site, and as such, is not the original source for the images it hosts. I could not find any copyright statement, "terms of use" or "about us" in the site, what makes me believe it's not a reliable source for images.

The same holds for image Image:Asia_Argento.jpg. The source site, http://www.celebopedia.com, stated "This site is not endorsed by Asia Argento or any organization Asia Argento is, was or will be associated with. ". So, this is surely not a primary source for promotional image of Asia Argento.

Kept as they are, these images are going to be marked for deletion soon.

Let me know if I may be helpfull in anything. Best regards, --Abu Badali 14:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Tara-reid-011.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tara-reid-011.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 200.214.44.134 13:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Asia Argento.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Asia Argento.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 15:38, 17 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sayitisntso.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sayitisntso.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)