User talk:Kilbosh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Noise pollution article

the Noise pollution article is a major and important article in Environmental science. do you really think your placement of the band note on line one is appropriate? i cant see anything in the band article that makes the band article notable. please remove the reference to the band at this point. there are guidelines on wikipedia for notability. i would encourage you to read them

please respond to this item on Talk:Noise pollution if you make a response to this postingAnlace 15:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Strampop

Hi Kilbosh.

I am sorry if I offended you by suggesting that there may be some sockpuppetry associated with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strampop. I meant no personal offense to yourself, but the manner of voting is suggestive of sockpuppetry. Please see WP:SOCK for details of this.

You may also wish to see the neologism article, to understand what a neologism is - describing an as-yet un defined niche is exactly what inventing a neologism is. Wikipedia is a secondary source; it is not a location for original work, nor is it somewhere to start a new term. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:No original research for further information on this.

If you have any further questions, by all means, please let me know via my talk page. Regards, Proto||type 15:05, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi again Kilbosh. Thanks for getting back to me. Firstly, as I gather from the article, stramb (pronounced "strump") is a Maltese word meaning strange. There is no article on 'strampop', 'stramb', or anything similar on the Maltese wikipedia (see here, which would be strange if this were really such a nationally-pervasive phenomenon. Also note the difference between a protologism and a neologism. I have retracted my sockpuppet statement, however. Again, I meant no offence; you must be aware that a list of IP addresses voting is often suggestive of sockpuppetry. Proto||type 15:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
i urge you to look at my user contributions if you seriously think i'm a sock puppet. as far as the vote, yes i am an imclusionist, but i am also a sensible human being. this was obviously a completely made up word with absolutely no verifiability. i made other votes that day... all for inclusion. Sparsefarce 17:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reasons for deletion

See my closing comments at the bottom of the AfD page. Don't take it personally. If it's impossible to independently verify that a thing exists, it cannot have an article in Wikipedia. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:12, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] notability for genres

I noticed you wrote something about the need for music genre guidelines on the talk page Wikipedia talk:Notability (music). There, I started some work on guidelines - it's just some rough ideas though. Please take a look at it and provide comments Spearhead 16:03, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Antifeminism

Hi, just to inform you that I've created a template for that userbox. Because of the German Wiki policy now effective, I had to move it to my personal space. Anyone may still use it though, by using this code: [[User:VodkaJazz/Userboxes/Antifeminism]]. └ VodkaJazz / talk ┐ 11:22, 30 July 2006 (UTC)