Talk:Killing vector field
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- If the Ricci curvature is positive, then a Killing field must have a zero.
May I ask how come? I had some idea that the Hopf fibration defines a nonvanishing vector field on S3, and that this field acts by isometries, but I might be wrong... (too tired to do the calculations tonight :/ ) Someone here who can help me, please? (A google on "killing field" + Hopf gave me e.g. this paper...see section III) \Mikez 03:06, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Hmm, that seems right to me. Writing the metric on S3 as
one sees that the vector field
which generates the U(1) action in the Hopf fibration, is a Killing field which has norm 1 everywhere (and hence is nonvanishing). -- Fropuff 07:11, 2005 Jan 9 (UTC)
-
- I have now removed that statement. \Mikez 18:58, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Killing Field??? Maths is awesome!!! 130.195.2.100 03:50, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Is there anyway this article could be edited so somebody without a degree in math can know what the flying flip it is talking about. I would really like to know, but the article is filled with so much math speciic jargon it is impossible without first reading 90 other articles. 88.154.199.46 08:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- It would be a pretty difficult to understand what a Killing field is without knowing what a Riemannian metric is at least. Most people who know that would have or be studying for a degree in mathematics or physics. There is no jargon in the article that I can see but it does rely on specialist terminology. Fortunately this is wikipedia so you can at least click on the links.Billlion 20:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
This article does have an interesting name. 88.154.243.24 08:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)